Analysis of the Quantitative Composition of Natural and Quasi-Natural Sites in the Northern Part of the Donetsk People's Republic

Authors

  • Andrew A. Blackburn Donetsk botanical garden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17308/geo/1609-0683/2026/1/4-12

Keywords:

natural and quasi-natural area, ecological framework, ecological network, Donetsk People's Republic

Abstract

The purpose of the research is to conduct a comparative analysis of the natural framework of the northern part of the Donetsk Region, represented by the Alexandrovsky, Slavyansky, Krasnolimansky, and Artemovsky districts of the Donetsk People's Republic (DPR), within the framework of the primary inventory of natural and quasi-natural sites. Materials and methods. The main types of natural and quasi-natural sites of the investigated areas have been identifi ed by visual assessment and decryption of satellite images from open access using the QGIS Development Team computer programme. Results and discussion. The number, occupied areas and places of increased concentration of natural and quasi-natural sites of the DPR have been determined. There is a signifi cant diff erence in composition, quantity and occupied areas between the studied administrative districts of the DPR. The most signifi cant diff erence between them lies in the presence of large-sized steppe areas representing the zonal type of vegetation. Conclusions. It is necessary to study the steppe areas more thoroughly in order to include them in the regional ecological network and as part of the specially protected natural territories of the Donetsk region.

Author Biography

  • Andrew A. Blackburn, Donetsk botanical garden

    Senior Researcher at the Laboratory of Natural Flora and Nature Reserves

References

Блакберн А. А. Площадь и фрагментированность природного каркаса в Краснолиманском, Славянском и Константиновском районах Донецкой Народной Республики // Региональные геосистемы, 2025, № 49 (1), с. 169-183.

Блакберн А. А. Оценка экологического каркаса Донецкого региона на основе первичной инвентаризации ег природных и квазиприродных территорий // Региональные геосистемы, 2022, № 46 (2), с. 267-283.

Мирзеханова З. Г., Климина Е. М. Сохранение ландшафтного разнообразия для региональной экологической политики: значимость и проблемы применения // Вестник Воронежского государственного университета. Серия: География. Геоэкология, 2023, № 1, с. 113-121.

Савин И. Ю., Березуцкая Э. Р. Концепция наземного покрова (Land Cover) как основа дистанционного мониторинга земель // Региональные геосистемы, 2024, № 48 (1), с. 77-90.

Стишов М. С., Дадли Н. Охраняемые природные территории Российской Федерации и их категории. Москва: Всемирный фонд дикой природы (WWF), 2018. 248 с.

Explore the Worlds Protected Areas. Electronic resource. – URL: http://protectedplanet.net (accessed 20.09.2021). – Text: electronic.

EcoServ-GIS v.3.3: A toolkit for mapping ecosystem services. A review of the tool's capabilities and possible applications // Scottish Natural Heritage, 2018.

QGIS Development Team. 2019. Electronic resource. – URL: https://qgis.org. (Accessed 20.09.2021). – Text: electronic

Published

2026-02-27

Issue

Section

Physical geography and biogeography, soil geography and landscape geochemistry

How to Cite

Blackburn, A. A. (2026). Analysis of the Quantitative Composition of Natural and Quasi-Natural Sites in the Northern Part of the Donetsk People’s Republic. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Geography. Geoecology, 1, 4-12. https://doi.org/10.17308/geo/1609-0683/2026/1/4-12