Economic Assessment of the Environmental Damage Caused to the Aquatic Bodies in the Krasnoyarsk Region
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17308/geo/1609-0683/2026/1/95-101Keywords:
environmental damage, oil spill, Norilsk Nickel, fine amountAbstract
The purpose is to demonstrate the specifi cs of the methodology for determining the amount of the fi ne for damage caused to water bodies using the example of the fi ne for damage caused to water bodies in the Krasnoyarsk Region. Materials and methods. The methodology of the conducted research was based on the statistical analysis of data from companies and authorities on the pollution of water bodies, «Methodology for calculating the amount of damage caused to water bodies due to violation of water legislation», an algorithm for conducting calculations with justifi cation for the choice of coeffi cients developed by the authors, as well as a comprehensive interpretation of the results obtained and a comparative analysis. Results and discussion. The methodology was tested, and quantitative assessments of the environmental damage caused to water bodies in the Krasnoyarsk region were obtained. The calculations carried out by JSC NTEK, the Federal Service for Supervision of Natural Resources Management (Rosprirodnadzor), as well as the Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics SB RAS (IPGG SB RAS) are presented. Despite using the same methodology for calculating damage to water bodies, the end result was diff erent, due to the choice of diff erent input parameters for the scale and duration of damage to the model. The role of the fi ne paid by PJSC Norilsk Nickel in the budget of the Russian Federation, as well as in environmental expenditures of the Krasnoyarsk Region, is shown. It is concluded that additional explanations are needed on the application of coeffi cients used to determine the amount of damage caused to the environment. Conclusions. The accident at CHPP-3 of JSC NTEK led to a signifi cant deterioration in the ecosystems of the Krasnoyarsk Region, and the damage assessment obtained by the authors confi rms the assessment of Rosprirodnadzor. The current methodology allows for obtaining diff erent damage estimates by selecting coeffi cients, and therefore it is advisable to clarify the methodology.
References
Батурин А. С. Некоторые проблемы административных штрафов за экологические правонарушения // Вестник наук, 2023, т. 3, № 3 (60), с. 113-119.
Болтанова Е. С., Кратенко М. В. Экологический риск, экологический вред и страхование: гражданское и экологическое законодательство и правоприменение в Российской Федерации // Журнал российского права, 2022, т. 26, № 12, с. 145-159.
Кравец В. Д. Особенности имущественной ответственности за экологические правонарушения // Вестник Университета имени О. Е. Кутафина, 2023, № 5 (105), c. 197-203.
Красноштанова Н. Е., Биличенко И. Н. Влияние нефтегазодобывающей промышленности на традиционное природопользование коренных малочисленных народов Севера Иркутской области // Вестник ВГУ. Серия: География. Геоэкология, 2023, № 4, с. 123-130.
Сазонов А. Д., Комаров Р. С., Передера О. С. Разлив нефтепродуктов в Норильске 29 мая 2020 года: предполагаемые причины и возможные экологические последствия // Экология. Экономика. Информатика. Серия: Системный анализ и
моделирование экономических и экологических систем, 2020, т. 1, № 5, с. 173-177.
Спиридонов Д. В. К вопросу о недропользовании в арктическом регионе // Право и государство: теория и практика, 2021, № 9 (201), с. 77-83.
Фаткулин С. Т., Безручко А. Ю., Мулюкова М. В. К вопросу об административной ответственности юридических лиц за экологические правонарушения (на примере Челябинской области) // Правопорядок: история, теория, практика, 2020, № 2 (25), с. 44-49.
Филатов Н. Ю. Возмещение вреда при экологических катастрофах: зарубежный опыт // Экономическая безопасность и права человека в контексте гражданского и арбитражного судопроизводства, 2021, с. 287-291.
Appiah L. O. When Do Firms Respond to External Pressure for Environmental Management? Insights from Deterrence Theory // Sustainable Futures, 2024, vol. 8, no. 100356.
Du K., Cheng Y., Yao X. Environmental regulation, green technology innovation, and industrial structure upgrading: The road to the green transformation of Chinese cities // Energy Economics, 2021, vol. 98, no. 105247.
Kun Q., Chang Y., Runkai N. The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Enterprise Green Innovation // Economic Analysis and Policy, 2024, vol. 84, pp. 1933-1944.
Maximal fi nes and corruption: An experimental study on illegal waste disposal / Abatemarco A., Cascavilla A., Dell’Anno R., Morone A. // Waste Management, 2024, vol. 183, pp. 153-162.
Saes B. M., Muradian R. What misguides environmental risk perceptions in corporations? Explaining the failure of Vale to prevent the two largest mining disasters in Brazil // Resources Policy, 2021, vol. 72, no. 102022.
Zhang J., Chen S., Gao C. Does environmental regulation promote enterprise environmental protection investments? A quasi-natural experiment from river chief system in the Yangtze River delta of China // Heliyon, 2024, vol. 10, no. 15.
