Юридическая доктрина и профессиональное мышление юристов
Ключевые слова:
юридическая доктрина, юридическое мышление, типы и уровни юридического мышления, романо-германское право, доктринальные юридические понятия, стандартизация профессионального сознания, механизм саморазвития права, философская картина мира, системы мышления
Аннотация
Статья посвящена исследованию связи между юридической доктриной и профессиональным мышлением юристов в рамках западной традиции права. Обосновывается тезис, что одной из ведущих функций юридической доктрины является функция нормирования профессионального мышления юристов. Статья состоит из четырех частей: в первой – определяется доктринальный характер романо-германского права; во второй – раскрывается понятие и кратко характеризуются «уровни» юридического мышления; в третьей – объясняется процесс нормирования профессионального мышления, определяются его характер, средства, способы и результаты; в четвертой – обозначаются пределы доктринального нормирования мышления юристов.
Скачивания
Данные скачивания пока не доступны.
Литература
1. Avenarius M. Roman Law in Russia / trans. D. Poldnikov. Moscow, 2008. 160 p.
2. Alekseev S. S. General Theory of Law. Moscow, 2008. 565 p.
3. Alekseev S. S. Law on the Threshold of the New Millennium: Some Trends in World Legal Development – Hope and Drama of the Modern Era // Alekseev S. S. Collected Works in 10 vols. Vol. 5. Moscow, 2010. 547 p.
4. Anners E. History of European Law. Moscow, 1996. 395 p.
5. Berman G. J. Faith and the Law: Reconciling Law and Religion. Moscow, 2008. 463 p.
6. Berman G. J. Western Legal Tradition: the Era of Formation. Moscow, 1998. 624 p.
7. Weber M. Economy and Society: Essays on Understanding Sociology in 4 vols. Vol. 3. Law. Moscow, 2018. 331 p.
8. Gubaeva. T. V. Language and Law. Moscow, 2003. 156 p.
9. David R. The main legal systems of modernity. Moscow, 2009. 453 p.
10. Jhering R. v. The Spirit of Roman Law // Jhering R. v. Selected Works. In 2 vols. Vol. 2. Saint Petersburg, 2006. 547 p.
11. Jhering R. v. Legal Technique. Moscow, 2008. 229 p.
12. Knapp V., Gerlokh A. Logic in Legal Mind. Moscow, 1987. 310 p.
13. Kuznetsov K. A. Reform of legal education in Germany (end) // Legal Bulletin. Publication of the Moscow Law Society. 1889. No 4. P. 591–631.
14. Lloyd D. The Idea of Law. A Repressive Evil or Social Necessity? Moscow, 2002. 416 p.
15. Marx K. The poverty of philosophy. Reply to M. Proudhon's «Philosophy of Poverty» // Marx K., Engels F. Works. 2nd ed. Moscow, 1955. Vol. 4. P. 65–185.
16. Marx K. Trial against the Rhine Regional Committee of Democrats // Marx K., Engels F. Works. 2nd ed. Moscow, 1957. Vol. 6. P. 254–272.
17. Nersesyants V. S. General theory of law and state. Textbook for high schools. Moscow, 2002. 552 p.
18. Savigny F. K v. Of the Vocation of Our Age for Legislation and Jurisprudence // Savigny F. K v. System of Modern Roman Law. Vol. 1 / Trans. by G. Zhigulin. Moscow, 2011. 510 p.
19. Skakun O. F. Legal deontology. Textbook for high schools. Kharkiv, 2002. 503 p.
20. Tarasov N. N. To be highly cultured professionals. Interview to the newspaper «Jurist» // Jurist. No 1 (43). 2004. P. 1–2.
21. Tarasov N. N. History and Methodology of Legal Science: Methodological Problems of Jurisprudence. Moscow, 2019. 218 p.
22. Tarasov N. N. Methodological Problems of Legal Science. Yekaterinburg, 2001. 264 p.
23. Tarasov N. N. Legal Tradition and Continuity in Law: Methodological Basis for Research // Electronic Supplement to the Russian Legal Journal. 2020. No 3. P. 5–14.
24. Hoecke M. v. Law as Communication. Saint Petersburg, 2012. 287 p.
25. Zweigert K., Kötz H. Introduction to comparative law in the field of private law. In 2 vols. T. 1. Fundamentals. Moscow, 2000. 480 p.
26. Chestnov I. L. Postclassical Theory of Law. Saint Petersburg, 2012. 649 p.
27. Engels F. Ludwig Feuerbach and the end of classical German philosophy // Marx K., Engels F. Works. 2nd ed. Moscow, 1961. Vol. 21. P. 269–317.
28. Schlag P. The Problem of the Subject // Tex. L. Rev. 1991. No 69. P. 1627–1743.
2. Alekseev S. S. General Theory of Law. Moscow, 2008. 565 p.
3. Alekseev S. S. Law on the Threshold of the New Millennium: Some Trends in World Legal Development – Hope and Drama of the Modern Era // Alekseev S. S. Collected Works in 10 vols. Vol. 5. Moscow, 2010. 547 p.
4. Anners E. History of European Law. Moscow, 1996. 395 p.
5. Berman G. J. Faith and the Law: Reconciling Law and Religion. Moscow, 2008. 463 p.
6. Berman G. J. Western Legal Tradition: the Era of Formation. Moscow, 1998. 624 p.
7. Weber M. Economy and Society: Essays on Understanding Sociology in 4 vols. Vol. 3. Law. Moscow, 2018. 331 p.
8. Gubaeva. T. V. Language and Law. Moscow, 2003. 156 p.
9. David R. The main legal systems of modernity. Moscow, 2009. 453 p.
10. Jhering R. v. The Spirit of Roman Law // Jhering R. v. Selected Works. In 2 vols. Vol. 2. Saint Petersburg, 2006. 547 p.
11. Jhering R. v. Legal Technique. Moscow, 2008. 229 p.
12. Knapp V., Gerlokh A. Logic in Legal Mind. Moscow, 1987. 310 p.
13. Kuznetsov K. A. Reform of legal education in Germany (end) // Legal Bulletin. Publication of the Moscow Law Society. 1889. No 4. P. 591–631.
14. Lloyd D. The Idea of Law. A Repressive Evil or Social Necessity? Moscow, 2002. 416 p.
15. Marx K. The poverty of philosophy. Reply to M. Proudhon's «Philosophy of Poverty» // Marx K., Engels F. Works. 2nd ed. Moscow, 1955. Vol. 4. P. 65–185.
16. Marx K. Trial against the Rhine Regional Committee of Democrats // Marx K., Engels F. Works. 2nd ed. Moscow, 1957. Vol. 6. P. 254–272.
17. Nersesyants V. S. General theory of law and state. Textbook for high schools. Moscow, 2002. 552 p.
18. Savigny F. K v. Of the Vocation of Our Age for Legislation and Jurisprudence // Savigny F. K v. System of Modern Roman Law. Vol. 1 / Trans. by G. Zhigulin. Moscow, 2011. 510 p.
19. Skakun O. F. Legal deontology. Textbook for high schools. Kharkiv, 2002. 503 p.
20. Tarasov N. N. To be highly cultured professionals. Interview to the newspaper «Jurist» // Jurist. No 1 (43). 2004. P. 1–2.
21. Tarasov N. N. History and Methodology of Legal Science: Methodological Problems of Jurisprudence. Moscow, 2019. 218 p.
22. Tarasov N. N. Methodological Problems of Legal Science. Yekaterinburg, 2001. 264 p.
23. Tarasov N. N. Legal Tradition and Continuity in Law: Methodological Basis for Research // Electronic Supplement to the Russian Legal Journal. 2020. No 3. P. 5–14.
24. Hoecke M. v. Law as Communication. Saint Petersburg, 2012. 287 p.
25. Zweigert K., Kötz H. Introduction to comparative law in the field of private law. In 2 vols. T. 1. Fundamentals. Moscow, 2000. 480 p.
26. Chestnov I. L. Postclassical Theory of Law. Saint Petersburg, 2012. 649 p.
27. Engels F. Ludwig Feuerbach and the end of classical German philosophy // Marx K., Engels F. Works. 2nd ed. Moscow, 1961. Vol. 21. P. 269–317.
28. Schlag P. The Problem of the Subject // Tex. L. Rev. 1991. No 69. P. 1627–1743.
Опубликован
2022-11-22
Выпуск
Раздел
Теория и история государства и права
