On the argumentative essence of the court sentence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17308/law/1995-5502/2022/3/274-285Keywords:
sentence, documentary text, argumentationAbstract
In this article, the author examines the essence of the sentence as a legal document, the logical-compositional and substantive features of which are strictly regulated by law. At the same time, the sentence contains an analytical component in the form of reasons of the court's conclusions, what allows us to consider it as an argumentative text. The combination of the formalization of the sentence with its argumentation, according to the author, is one of the main features of the sentence as a specific legal text. The author asks the question about the place of legal reasoning in the structure of the sentence. It is argued that in the text of the sentence, argumentation is the main means of making sense.
Downloads
References
Alexandrov A. S. Purpose and means of argumentation in criminal proceedings / Legal technology. Yearbook. N. Novgorod. 2013. № 7, part 1. P. 52–59.
Bortnikov V. I., Mikhailova Yu. N. Documentary linguistics: study guide. Allowance. Yekaterinburg : Ural University Publishing House, 2017. 132 p.
Vasilenko L. Yu. Linguo-cognitive analysis of argumentation in the text of the judgment: author. dis. ... Cand. philol. Sciences. M., 2011. 18 p.
Vasilenko S. K. The use of automated technologies in the production of court procedural documents // Russian judge. 2006. № 9. P. 15–18.
Danilevskaya N. V. Argumentative actions in the framework of cognitive // Stereotype and creativity in the text: interuniversity. Sat. scientific. works / otv. ed. M. P. Kotyurov. Perm, 2004. Р. 137–161.
Zaitsev D. V., Belikov A. A. Modeling argumentation: assessments and reasoning // Proceedings of the Tomsk State University. U niversity Philosophy. Sociology. Political science. 2020. № 57. P. 13–24.
Zayakin A., Smagin A. The judges are holding us by the blank. URL: https://www.novayagazeta.ru/articles/2019/03/20/79929-sudi-derzhat-nas-za-bolvanku
Karasik V. I. On the types of discourse // Language personality: institutional and personal discourse: collection of scientific papers. Volgograd, 2000. P. 7–12.
Karasik V. I. Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse. Volgograd, 2002. 477 р.
Kupina N. A., Matveeva T. V. Stylistics of the modern Russian language: a textbook for bachelors. M. : Ural. federal un-t : Yurayt, 2013. 415 p.
Kushneruk S. P. Documentary linguistics (Russian business text): textbook. Volgograd : Volgograd Publishing House state University, 1999. 96 p.
Kyrkunova L. G. Functional and semantic types of speech in the aspect of intrabranch differentiation of investigative and judicial acts // Stereotype and creativity in the text. Perm, 2004. Issue. 7. P. 290–312.
Matveeva T. V. Functional styles in the aspect of text categories: synchronous-contrastive sketch. Sverdlovsk : Publishing house Ural university, 1990. 172 p.
Novitsky V. A. Judicial argumentation as an independent means of proof // Procedural actions of a verbal nature. Collection of articles based on the materials of the All-Russian round table (November 18–19, 2016) / Under total. ed. K. B. Kalinovsky, L. A. Slash. SPb., 2017. P. 128–133.
Palashevskaya I. V. Adversarial and persuasive aspects of judicial discourse // Proceedings of VSU. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication. 2011. № 1. P. 137–141.
Smagin N. G. Automation of the procedural activity of the investigator in criminal proceedings // Proceedings of the VI Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2020. № 2. Р. 301–306.
Sushentsova T. V. Structural and substantive specifics of argumentation in court decisions: author. dis. ... Cand. philol. Sciences. Tver, 2015. 19 p.
