Цифровизация уголовного судопроизводства и арбитража Китая: проблемы и принципы

О. Л. Грановская; Д. Р. Зверев

doi:10.17308/law/1995-5502/2024/3/198-206

Authors

O. L. Granovskaya Vladivostok State University, Far Eastern Federal University
D. R. Zverev Voronezh State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17308/law/1995-5502/2024/3/198-206

Keywords:

digitalization, сriminal proceedings, аrbitration, system «206», APEC-ODR, «3 N» model

Abstract

The trends, problems, and principles of digitalization of arbitration and criminal proceedings carried out in the last few years as part of Chinese judicial reform are analyzed. The paper focuses on the advantages and disadvantages, functionality, and efficacy of the developed AI systems: the Shanghai intelligent criminal case processing system «206», the «Guangzhou Intelligent Adjudication System», the online dispute resolution platform for business «APEC-ODR», the «3 + N litigation model». General scientific (system-structural and case-study methods) and special legal methods of cognition (formal legal and comparative legal) were used.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

O. L. Granovskaya, Vladivostok State University, Far Eastern Federal University

Doctor of Philosophy, Professor of the Department of Theory and History of Russian and Foreign Law; Professor of the Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies of the School of Arts and Humanities of the Far Eastern Federal University
D. R. Zverev, Voronezh State University

Post-graduate Student of the Department of Civil Law and Procedure

References

Dragilev E. V., Dragileva L. L., Drovaleva L. S., Palamarchuk S. A. Informatization of the Judicial System of China // Legal science. 2022. No 8. P. 54-59.

Vinnikova R. V. International Norms on the Competence of Arbitration Courts in the Russian Federation to Consider Cases Involving Foreign Persons // Bulletin of ChelSU. 2003. No. 1. P. 104–111.

Cui Yadong. «Artificial Intelligence» Makes Judicature More Just, Efficient and Authoritative – the Theoretical Analysis and Practical Exploration of «Artificial Intelligence» in Judicial Field // Сhina Law and Policy Association. 2017. No 10. URL: https://law.stanford.edu/china-law-and-policy-association-clpa/articles/

Mao L. Codenamed «206». The Shanghai Criminal Court Intelligent Auxiliary Case Handling System Was Officially «Decrypted» // Dong. 2017. No 1. P. 123–126.

Xiong Qiuhong. Artifi cial Intelligence and Criminal Justice: From One Word to Multiple Balance, Procuratorial Daily-Digital, Procuratorial Special Issue, Science and Technology (May 5, 2023). URL: https://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/llyj/202305/t20230524_614789.shtml

Sun D. Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Accurate Prediction of the Chinese Situation of Sentencing. Take Plea Cases as the Applicable Field // Jinan Journal. 2020. No 12. P. 64–78.

Artificial Intelligence Walked into the Court to «Judge the Case», Henan Net Letter Network (No 12, 2023). URL: https://www.hnwxw.net/Article/11719.html

Feng Yifan. Overview of the Artificial Intelligence supervision system, People's Court (No 11, 2023). URL: https://www.chinacourt.org/article/detail/2023/11/id/7617919.shtml

Zhu Jian. Committed to Building a New High Ground for International Arbitration Demonstration, Rule of Law Day (No 11, 2023) URL: https://www.moj.gov.cn/pub/sfbgw/fzgz/fzgzggflfwx/fzgzggflfw/202311/t20231115_489588.html

Zhang Ningdan. The Guangzhou Arbitration Commission Issued the World's First Internet Arbitration Standard, Rule of Law Daily (No 10, 2020) URL: https://www.chinacourt.org/article/detail/2020/10/id/5520128.shtml