Legal issues of protection and portability of patient data in medical information and analytical systems

Authors

  • D. A. Lebedeva National Research University «Higher School of Economics»

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17308/law/1995-5502/2026/1/66-77

Keywords:

medical information and analytical systems, unified state health information system, protection of medical data, portability of medical data

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of problems in the field of ensuring the protection and portability of patient data in medical information and analytical systems (hereinafter - MIAS). The purpose of the study is a comprehensive analysis of the legal regulation of the MIAS of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The research used general scientific methods: analysis and synthesis, deduction and induction, forecasting, modeling, as well as special methods: technical-legal and comparative-legal. The study identified the following disadvantages of protecting patients' medical data were identified: the lack of uniform requirements for the protection of medical information in the MIAS of different subjects of the Russian Federation, the problem of the portability of medical information from the MIAS of one subject of the Russian Federation to another, financial and technical problems of creating the federal unified state health information system of the Russian Federation (hereinafter - the EGISZ of the Russian Federation). The main practical limitation is the lack of accessible information on the level of digitalization in healthcare and on registered leaks of patient data in remote regions of Russia. The methodological limitation is the discrepancy between the approaches of the legislator and legal scholars regarding the level of government access to patient data and the methods of storing medical information in healthcare institutions. The need for all subjects of the Russian Federation to switch to the Unified State Register of Medical Sciences of the Russian Federation, which will contribute to solving the problem of the portability of medical information when a patient moves from one subject of the Russian Federation to another subject by automatically uploading his medical data with the consent of the patient. The author also proposes to create uniform standards for the interaction of MIAS of all subjects of the Russian Federation, to strengthen information security measures by strengthening responsibility in the legislation on personal data for violation of the rules for the protection of medical data of patients.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • D. A. Lebedeva, National Research University «Higher School of Economics»

    Lecturer, Post-Graduate Student, Juni or Research Fellow at the Department of Digital Technology Law and Biolaw at the Faculty of Law

References

Amelin R. V., Bessonov L. V. The legal regime of information resources of medical information systems // Izvestiya of Saratov University. New Series. Series: Economics. Management. Law.2019. No. 19(4). P. 428- 435.

Anashkina E. D. Unified medical information and analytical system : features and prospects // Mathematical Models of Engineering, Technology, and Economics : Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Student Conference, Sankt-Peterburg, 14–15 may 2019. Sankt-Peterburg : POLITEX-PRESS, 2019. P. 75–77.

Ashpetova M. V. Features of the digitalization of MIS as a tool for improving the quality of work in medical institutions // Tatishchev Readings : Current Issues in Science and Practice. Tolyatti : V. N. Tatishchev Volzhsky University (Institute), 2021. Vol. 1. P. 155–157.

Gusev A. V. Healthcare Information Systems : Status, Usage, and Trends // Medical doctor and information technologies. 2011. No. 3. P. 6–14.

Gusev A. V., Vladzimirskij A. V., Golubev N. A., Zarubina T. V. Informatization of Healthcare in the Russian Federation : History and Results of Development // National Health Care (Russia). 2021. No. 2(3). P. 5–17.

Demkina A. E. The evolution of Digital Medicine. World and Domestic Experience // Lomonosov Public Administration Journal. Series 21: Management (state and society). 2023. Vol. 20, No. 2. P. 3–26.

Zhuravlev M. S. Interoperability as Factor of Law Development in the Digital Economy (eHealth Case) // Law Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2019. No. 3. P. 98–116.

Konovalov A. A. Current Legal Aspects of the Organization of the Regional Medical Information and Analysis Center at its Functional Evolution // Medical doctor and information technologies.2016. No. 2. P.6–12.

Kulakov A. A., Seregin S. S. The History of Development of Medical Information Systems // Dentistry. 2015. No. 94(6). P. 50–53.

Nazarenko G. I., Guliev Ya. I., Ermakov D. E. Medical information systems : theory and practice / ed. by. G. I. Nazarenko. Moscow : Fizmatlit, 2005. P. 120.

Nazarov N. A. Ensuring Data Quality in Automated Decision-Making in Public Administration // Journal of Russian Law. 2024. No. 5. P. 140–155.

Pavlov A. V. Legal Regulation of Public Relations on the Medical secrecy in the Kingdom of Denmark and in the Russian Federation : A Selective Comparative Analysis // Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law. 2017. No. 4. P. 74–80.

Pozdnyakova M. A., Konovalov A. A. Medical information and analytical center in the system of organizing information support for the regional healthcare system // Preventive medicine as a scientific and practical basis for maintaining and strengthening public health : Collection of scientific papers. Nizhny Novgorod : Remedium Privolzhye. 2016. No. 3. P. 176–186.

Savelev A. I. The Issues of Implementing Legislation on Personal Data in the Era of Big Data // Law Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2015. No. 1. P. 43–66.

Bincoletto G. Data protection issues in cross-border interoperability of Electronic Health Record systems within the European Union. Data & Policy. 2020. P. 3–4. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340274165_Data_protection_issues_in_crossborder_interoperability_of_Electronic_Health_Record_systems_within_the_European_Union

Chapman JR., Wang JC., Wiechert K. Big Spine Data Put to Good Use : the NHS Sets an Example // Global Spine J. 2019. P. 689–691.

Holt M., MacGibbon J., Smith A., Broady TR., Davis MD., Newman CE. Knowledge of Australia's My Health Record and factors associated with opting out : results from a national survey of the Australian general population and communities affected by HIV and sexually transmissible infections. PLOS Digit Health. 2023. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/ PMC9977020/

Mantovani E., Quinn P. mHealth and data protection – the letter and the spirit of consent legal requirements // International Review of Law, Computers & Technology. 2014. Vol. 28. Issue 2. P. 222.

Momenipur A., Priyadarshini R. Balancing documentation and direct patient care activities : a study of a mature electronic health record system // International journal of industrial ergonomics. 2019. Vol. 72. P. 338–346.

Reinhold Haux Medical informatics : past, pre sent, future // International journal of medical informatics. 2010. No. 79. P. 599–610.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-29

Issue

Section

Digital law. Artificial intelligence