Administrative and legal regulation in the field of counteraction to plagiarism by preparation and protection of scientific and qualification works
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17308/vsu.proc.law.2020.2/2808Keywords:
intellectual property, copyright, plagiarism, scientific and qualification work, administrative and legal regulation, administrative responsibility, anti-plagiarismAbstract
Purpose of the present article: a research of problems of administrative and legal regulation of identification and suppression of copyright infringement (plagiarism) by preparation and protection of scientific and qualification works. Results: first, according to the author, it is necessary to fix legislatively obligatory licensing of such type of activity as provision of services on verification of the text on originality by means of the software. Within article the author formulates a complex of license requirements which should be shown in case of acceptance of such legislative solution. Secondly, it is necessary to determine normative an order of use of software and hardware complexes by identification of plagiarism when checking scientific and qualification works and the algorithm of actions of staff of educational institutions at identification of such facts. Thirdly, the author suggests expanding limits of use of administrative responsibility for violation of copyright, having extended it, including, and to plagiarism cases by preparation of scientific and qualification works due to entering of point changes into a disposition of Part 1 of Article 7.12 of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offences. Fourthly, it is offered to fix legislatively a supporting role of program technical means of identification of plagiarism for the scientific and pedagogical workers implementing the scientific manual and the state certification and to prohibit establishment of limits of originality of scientific and qualification works as higher educational institutions and dissertation councils.
Downloads
References
Киселев А. Защищен ли автор на рынке интеллектуальных прав? // СПС "КонсультантПлюс". 2013.
Кузеванов А.И. Общая характеристика механизма охраны и защиты объектов авторских и смежных прав в Российской Федерации // ИС. Авторское право и смежные права. 2016. № 7. С. 31 – 44.
Кулаков Н.А. Административно-правовые средства противодействия нарушениям авторских прав (плагиату) при подготовке и защите научно-квалификационных работ // Право интеллектуальной собственности. 2018. №.4. С. 14 – 18.
Никитин К. Защита авторских прав в интернет-среде // ЭЖ-Юрист. 2016. СПС "КонсультантПлюс". 2016. № 50. С. 14 – 19.
Онищенко В.Н., Хабибулин А.Г. Антиплагиат и диссернет: наука или политика? // Мир политики и социологии. 2016. № 10. С. 31– 37.
Петренко Е.Г., Новикова О.В. Международно-правовая защита авторских прав в сети Интернет // Ленинградский юридический журнал. 2016. № 3. С. 108 – 116.
Порунова О.А. «Продажа» права авторства исполнителями научных работ: возможности привлечения к административной ответственности // Административное право и процесс. 2014. № 8. С. 75 – 79.
Статья в Википедии. Антиплагиат. [Электронный ресурс] Режим доступа: URL
Чернов Ю.И., Салова К.О. Гражданско-правовые и административно-правовые аспекты создания и развития в России системы «антиплагиат» // Власть закона. 2017. С. 162 – 169.









