Legal gaps and conflicts of pension legislation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17308/vsu.proc.law.2021.1/3291

Keywords:

social policy of state, efficiency, pension system, libertarian law theory of thinking, recalculation of pensions, non-insurance periods, conditions of pensions assigning, indexation of pensions, social justice, social services, rural experience, work in public organizations, gaps, collisions

Abstract

A lot of time has passed since the adoption of the next law on insurance pensions and related laws. The number of changes to it already now clearly indicates the quality of this law. Following the path of correcting certain obvious mistakes of the previous legislation, the legislator not only failed to correct most of the mistakes, but also created new problems that citizens face when exercising their constitutional right to pension benefits. The article examines individual cases of gaps and collisions of modern pension legislation that do not correspond to social justice and, accordingly, contradict the principle of formal equality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Nadezhda Zueva, Voronezh State University

    Candidate of Legal Seienses, Associate Professor of the Labor Law Department

References

Downloads

Published

2021-03-15

Issue

Section

Labour Law