THE ROLE OF INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION IN UNDERSTANDING RUSSIAN PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS AND PROVERBS BY IRANIAN STUDENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17308/lic/1680-5755/2026/2/58-64Keywords:
phraseological unit, communication, language, intercultural, translation, translator, Russian language, Persian languageAbstract
When teaching Russian as a foreign language (RFL), the priority task is to develop students' linguacultural competence necessary for effective intercultural communication with native speakers. Teaching foreign students involves familiarization with the cultural context, which allows establishing a connection between superficial language structures and their deep meaning. Phraseological units and proverbs, in addition to representing reality and expressing axiological attitudes of native speakers towards various parts of the world, perform the function of transgenerational transmission of cultural and national attitudes and traditions. The subject of this study is the role of intercultural communication in understanding Russian phraseological units and proverbs by Iranian students. The object of the study is phraseological units and proverbs of the Russian and Persian languages. The purpose of this scientific article was to describe the universal and cultural-national features of the two linguacultural societies, to show the similarities and differences in the linguistic heritage of the people, reflected in proverbs and phraseological units. The research method is comparative-analytical, allowing to reveal similarities and differences in perception and interpretation of culturally specific language units. The result of this research is that different components and words are used in different language cultures to convey common concepts, which will be very interesting for language learners during their training and adaptation. As part of the study of intercultural communication in the context of translation studies of Iranian students, it was found that in order to ensure adequate translation, it is necessary to correctly decode both verbal and non-verbal intercultural symbols. The scientific novelty of this work consists in the fact that for the first time the research materials were analyzed, compared and systematized, and universal and cultural-national similarities and differences in the proverbial fund of Russian and Persian languages were also considered.
References
1. Karasik V. I. YAzykovoj krug: lichnost', kontsepty, diskurs (Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse). Moskva: Gnozis, 2004. 389 p.
2. Samokhvalova A.G., Ekimchuk O. T. Kommunikativnye trudnosti podrostkov: issledovanie psikhometricheskikh kachestv oprosnika «Trudnosti v obshchenii so sverstnikami i vzroslymi» // Psikhologicheskie issledovaniia: [zhurnal]. 2018. 11 (60). DOI: https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v11i60.276.
3. Orekhova E. N. Mezhkul’turnaja kommunikatsia kak osnovo effektivnogo obuchenija inostrannim yazykam // Vestnik Kostromskogo universiteta. Seriia: Pedagogika. Psikhologiya. Sotsiokinetika. 2021. № 2. T. 27. – Pp. 168–174.
4. Guleva, T. M. Mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsia v prepodavanii russkogo yazyka turkmenskim studentam // Mezhkul'turnaya kommunikatsiya i professional'no oriyentirovannoye obucheniye inostrannym yazykam: materialy VIII Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy 93-letiyu obrazovaniya Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta / redkol.: V. G. Shadurskiy [i dr.]. Minsk: Izd. tsentr BGU, 2014. — Pp. 191-192.
5. Mishkevich, M. V. Intercultural communication in the context of international business // Intercultural communication and professionally oriented teaching of foreign languages: materials of the VIII International conference dedicated to the 93rd anniversary of the Belarusian State University / editorial board: V. G. Shadursky [et al.]. Minsk: Publishing center of BSU, 2014. – Pp. 38-40.
6. Logvinenko A. D., Konovalova E. V. Vzaimosvyaz' yazyka i kul'tury (The relationship of language and culture) // Sbornik statej po materialam mezhvuzovskoj studencheskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferentsii. Saransk, 2022. Pp. 46-48.
7. Savina E. A. YAzyk i kul'tura. Vzaimosvyaz' i vliyanie (Language and Culture. Interrelation and Influence) // Molodoj uchenyj. 2023. − № 20 (467). Pp. 465-467.
8. Maslova V. A., Usmanov F. F. Vzaimodejstvie kul'tury i yazyka v gumanitarnykh issledovaniyakh (The Interaction of Culture and Language in Humanities Research) // O‘zbekistonda xorijiy tillar. 2023. № 6 (53). Pp. 37-47.
9. KHudoerova L. M. Rol' frazeologizmov i ikh ispol'zovaniya v rechi (The role of phraseological units and their use in speech) // International Journal of Economy and Innovation. 2024. № 51. Pp. 90-92.
10. Baisov U. K. Frazeologiya v sovremennom yazykoznanii (Phraseology in modern linguistics) // Oriental Renaissance: Innovative, educational, natural and social sciences. 2024. № 4 (5). Pp. 767-772.
11. Slovar' russkogo yazyka v 4 tomakh: (Dictionary of the Russian language: in 4 volumes:) P-R / gl. red. A. P. Evgen'eva. Akad. nauk SSSR, In-t rus. yaz. – M. : Rus. yaz., 1984. – 751 p.
12. Dal' V. I. Poslovitsy i pogovorki russkogo naroda (Proverbs of the Russian people). SPb, 1998. 544 p.
13. Fedorov A. I. Frazeologicheskij slovar’ russkogo literaturnogo yazyka [Phraseological dictionary of the Russian literary language]. M: Astrel’: AST, 2008, 828 p.
14. Farsadmanesh, S., yezhova, L. Russko-persidskii slovar’ poslovits I pogovorok. (Russian-Persian dictionary of proverbs) Tehran: Tegeranskii universitet, 2005. 321 p.
15. Babazade D. G. Russkaya frazeologiya v iranskoj auditoria (Russian Phraseology in Iranian Audiences). Tegeran: SAMT, 2018. 209 p.
16. Kurogli Kh. Persidsko-russkij slovar' poslovits i pogovorok (Persian-Russian dictionary of proverbs). Tegeran: Gutenberg, 1992. 615 p.
