CONCEPTUAL METAPHOR “WAR” IN THE SPEECH GENRE OF COMMENTARY

Authors

  • V. A. Buryakovskaya Volgograd State Social and Pedagogical University
  • N.A. Emelianova Astrakhan State Tatishchev University
  • R.R. Zubairova Astrakhan State Tatishchev University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17308/lic/1680-5755/2026/2/112-117

Keywords:

conceptual metaphor «war», mediagenre of commentary, commentator, English-language media discourse, feedback function

Abstract

The study focuses on the conceptual metaphor «war» in the genre of online comments. The authors use the theory of conceptual metaphorology by J. Lakoff and M. Johnson as a methodological framework. This theory views metaphors as mechanisms that shape our perception of reality. The study explores the role of metaphorical language in shaping public perception of current social and political challenges. The article analyzes the impact of war metaphors on users' emotional responses and their interpretation of news content. By examining a large corpus of comments on various publications in the English-speaking internet, the authors found a significant prevalence of military metaphors. The article examines specific examples of the use of lexical units such as «fight», «weapon», «attack», «enemy», and «strategy» in the coverage of non-military events. Special attention is given to the functional diversity of military metaphors, which allow users to distance themselves from anxious emotions, perceive problems through the lens of a controlled conflict, and defend their own beliefs. The study emphasizes that war metaphors in comments serve not only as expressive means but also as tools for shaping collective consciousness and subjective interpretations of reality.

Author Biographies

  • V. A. Buryakovskaya, Volgograd State Social and Pedagogical University

    Doctor of Philology, Head of the English Philology Department

  • N.A. Emelianova, Astrakhan State Tatishchev University

    PhD in Philology, associate professor of the Department of English Philology, Linguodidactics and Translation

  • R.R. Zubairova, Astrakhan State Tatishchev University

    assistant lecturer of the Department of English Philology, Linguodidactics and Translation

References

1. Wahl-Jorgensen K., Hanitzsch T. The Handbook of Journalism Studies, 1st edition // Routledge, 2008. 472 p.

2. Karasik V.I. Kommentarij kak tip kommunikativnogo dejstviya [Commentary as a type of communicative action] // Yazykovoe drevo zhizni: monografiya. Moskva: Gosudarstvennyj institut russkogo yazyka im. A.S.Pushkina, 2025. P. 239-246.

3. Kaminskaya T.L. Aksiologicheskaya polifoniya v internet-kommunikacii [Axiological poliphony in internet communication] // Medialingvistika. Rechevaya kommunikaciya v sredstvah massovoj informacii: mater. II Mezhdunar. nauch.-praktich. seminara. SPb.: SPbGU, 2013. T. 2. P. 208–211.

4. Thorson K., Vraga E., Ekdale B. Credibility in Context: How Uncivil Online Commentary Affects News Credibility // Mass Communication and Society. № 13. 2010. P. 289-313.

5. Anderson, C. The power of the crowd: How reader comments shape news credibility / C. Anderson, P. Smith // Journal of Communication. 2012. Vol. 62. № 1. P. 89–105.

6. Zimmer M., Johnson S. The Spiral of Silence in Online News // New Media & Society, 17(10), 2015. P. 1600-1616

7. Lakoff G., Johnson, M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980. 242 p.

8. Herring S.C. Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis: An Approach to Researching Online Behavior / S.C. Herring // Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. P. 338–376.

Published

2026-06-30

Issue

Section

Fоreign languages

How to Cite

CONCEPTUAL METAPHOR “WAR” IN THE SPEECH GENRE OF COMMENTARY. (2026). Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 2, 112-117. https://doi.org/10.17308/lic/1680-5755/2026/2/112-117