Sorption properties of modified montmorillonite for Sb(III) ions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17308/sorpchrom.2025.25/13577Keywords:
antimony, arsenic, modified montmorillonite, cationic surfactant, magnetite, sorption capacityAbstract
A composite sorbent based on montmorillonite (Na,Ca)0.33(Al, Mg)2(Si4O10)(OH)2⋅nH2O, containing magnetite nanoparticles and a cationic surfactant - dodecyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride C21H38NCl was characterized by X-ray phase analysis, the specific surface area and porosity of the sorbent were measured, and microscopic studies and electron probe X-ray spectral microanalysis were carried out. The possibility of extracting Sb (III) from aqueous solutions using this sorbent was studied. A comparison of sorption properties with respect to Sb (III) and As (III) ions was carried out. The degree of extraction of Sb (III) on MM:CSAC:Fe3O4 increases with increasing pH and reaches more than 90%, while the degree of extraction of As (III) does not depend on pH and reaches 99%. The Sorption process of Sb (III) on MM:CSAC:Fe3O4, is best described by the Freundlich model. The maximum experimental sorption capacity of MM:CSAC:Fe3O4 in relation to Sb (III) ions is lower than for As (III) and is 2.1 mg/g. The maximum degree of extraction of Sb (III) on MM:CSAC:Fe3O4 from aqueous solutions was observed over a period of 90 minutes. The highest degree of desorption of Sb (III) and As (III) was achieved using 5 M HCl, about 40 and 90%, respectively. The degree of extraction of Sb (III) and As (III) on MM:CSAC:Fe3O4 from the model solution was approximately 70 and 90%, respectively. The reduction in the degree of extraction of Sb (III) and As (III) on MM:CSAC:Fe3O4 was associated with the competing sorption of other ions. MM:CSAC:Fe3O4 can be recommended for use as a sorbent for the preliminary purification of aqueous solutions of complex composition from Sb (III) and As (III).
Downloads
References
Gan Y., Ding Ch., Xu B., Liu Z., Zhang S., Cui Y., Wu B., Huang W., Song X. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023; 442: 130072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130072
Ungureanu G., Santos S., Boaventura R., Botelho C. J. Environ. Manage. 2015; 151: 326-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.12.051
Carneiro M.A., Pintor A. M.A., Boaventura R. A. R, Botelho C. M.S., Sci. To-tal Environ. 2024; 929: 172602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172602
Anjum A., Datta M. J. Anal. Sci. Meth. Instrum. 2012; 2 (3): 167-175. https://doi.org/10.4236/jasmi.2012.23027
Jiang M., Wang K., Li G., Zhao Q., Wang W., Jiang J., Wang Y., Yuan L. Chem. Eng. J. 2023; 457: 141182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.141182
Bagherifam S., Komarneni S., van Hullebusch E.D., Stjepanovic M. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022; 29: 2073-2083. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15765-7
Belozerova A.A., Pechishheva N.V., Ordinarcev D.P. Holmanskih, I.A., Shunjaev, K.Ju., Sorbtsionnye i Khromatograficheskie Protsessy, 2023; 23(5): 258-267. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17308/sorpchrom.2023.23/11720
Ordinartsev D.P., Pechishcheva N.V., Estemirova S.Kh., Kim A.V., Shunyaev K.Yu., Hydrometallurgy. 2022; 208: 105813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2021.105813
Barraquea F., Montes M.L., Fernan-deza M.A., Candal R., Sanchez R. M. T., En-viron. Res. 2021; 192: 110247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110247
Almasri D.A., Rhadfi T., Atieh M.A., McKay G, Ahzi S., Chem. Eng. J. 2018; 335: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.031
Tandon P.K., Shukla R.C., Singh S.B. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013; 52(30): 10052-10058. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie400702k
Wang Z., Xue W., Tan J., Wang F., Wang J., Xia L., Hu X., Song S., Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025; 317(2): 144846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.144846
Haounati R., Ighnih H., Malekshah R.E., Nouj N., Ouachtak H., Sljukic B., Santos D.M.F., Hsini A., Shaim A., Jada A., Addi A. A., J. Mol. Liq. 2025; 428: 127490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2025.127490
Wang G., Yin M., Zhu G., Liang Guangchuan, Wang Dingzheng, Yang Jinlin, Ma S., Miner. Eng. 2025; 228: 109345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2025.109345
Cyubahiro E., Luo Z., Kayiranga A., Habumugisha T., Nkinahamira F., Nday-ishimiye J. C., Yan C., Guo J., Wang Z. De-salin. Water Treat. 2022; 253: 177-193. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2022.28301
Naz A., Chowdhury A. Mater. Today: Proc. 2022; 60(1): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.10.366
Huang Y., Wu L., Chang L., Peng W., Wang W., Cao Y. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025; 295: 139474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.139474
Liao J., Ding C., Jiang L., Shi J., Wang Q., Wang Z., Wang L., J. Hazard. Ma-ter. 2024; 480: 135741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135741
Ayawei N., Ebelegi A.N., Wankasi D. J. of Chem. 2017: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3039817
Sun W., Xiao E., Kalin M., Krumins V., Dong Y., Ning Z., Liu T., Sun M., Zhao Y., Wu S., Mao J., Xiao T., Environ. Pollut. 2016; 215: 213-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.05.008
SANPIN 1.2.3685-21. Gigienicheskie normativy i trebovanija k obespecheniju Be-zopasnosti i (ili) bezvrednosti dlja cheloveka faktorov sredy obitanija. Redakcija ot 30.12.2022 g. (In Russ.)









