Analysis of Local Charge Distribution on the Surface of Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Films
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17308/sorpchrom.2026.26/13698Keywords:
molecularly imprinted polymers, polyimide, scanning force microscopy, chargeAbstract
Molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) are synthetic molecular recognition materials that have attracted attention in recent years due to their high selectivity, stability, reusability toward target analytes, and versatility in various analytical applications. The electrochemical properties of MIPs largely depend on the surface morphology and the nature of charge distribution at the electrode-polymer and polymer-solution interphase boundaries. The study of local surface charges of MIPs allowed us to evaluate the heterogeneity of the surface, the nature of active centers, and the influence of synthesis conditions on the electrical characteristics of the polymer layer. Modern scanning probe microscopy methods, in particular scanning force microscopy (SFM), allowed us to study the surface of MIPs at the nanoscale, simultaneously analyzing its morphology and charge distribution, which provides a comprehensive study of processes at the electrode-polymer interface. Local charges on the surface of polyimides were investigated in the electromechanical response mode. For this purpose, a conductive TiN probe of a scanning microscope was used. A voltage was applied between it and the copper electrode of a planar amperometric sensor on which a polymer film was synthesized. For the non-imprinted polymer, changing the polarity on the probe did not result in a change in the SFM image or charge distribution. A different picture was observed for the molecularly imprinted polymer. When the negative pole was connected to the probe, the charge distribution was similar to that for the non-imprinted polymer. When reversing polarity, it was found that the entire surface of the MIP was covered with local charges.
Downloads
References
1. Erdem A., Senturk H., Karakus M. Ta-lanta Open. 2025; 12: 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talo.2025.100507
2. Li Y., Luo L., Kong Y., Li Y., Wang Q., Wang M., Li Y., Davenport A., Li B. Biosen-sors and Bioelectronics. 2024; 249: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2024.116018
3. Kim W., Cha Y. L., Kim D.J. ECS Sen-sors Plus. 2025; 4(1): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1149/2754-2726/adbe8b
4. Yeasmin S., Cheng L.J. Biomicrofluidics. 2024; 18(3): 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0194200
5. Uzun L., Turner A.P.F. Biosensors and Bioelectronics. 2016; 76: 131-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2015.07.013
6. Xu Z., Jin X., Li Y., Zhang M., Yin W., Yang Y., Jia W., Xie D. RSC Advances. 2024; 14: 3834-3840. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RA06668A
7. Baziak A., Kusior A. Sensors. 2024; 24(16): 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24165290
8. Moutcine A., Laghlimi C., Ziat Y., Isaad J., Bahraoui S. E., Chtaini A. Scientific Re-ports. 2024; 14: 1-12. https://doi.org/s41598-024-58281-7
9. Malev V.V., Kondratiev V.V., Timonov A.M. Polymer-modified electrodes. St. Petersburg: Nestor-History. 2012. 346 p. (In Russ.)
10. García-Calzón J.A., Díaz-García M.E. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2007; 123(2): 1180-1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2006.10.068
11. Sakata T., Nishitani S., Kajisa T. RSC Advances. 2020; 10(29): 16999-17013. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ra02793f
12. Bentley C.L., Kang M., Unwin P.R. Current Opinion in Electrochemistry. 2017; 6(1): 23-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coelec.2017.06.011
13. Bang J.J., Russell S.R., Ruppa K.K., Claridge S.A. Analytical Methods. 2015; 17: 7106-7127. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5AY00507H
14. Valdrè G., Moro D., Ulian G. Materials Science and Engineering. 2014; 55: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/55/1/012019
15. Pham Thi Gam, Tertyshnikova O.A., Zyablov A.N., Vyborny A.Yu., Litvinova N.A. Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 2025; 80(9): 996-1002. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044450225090085
16. Pham Thi Gam, Bobrinskaya E.V., Zyablov A.N., Nguyen Anh Tien, Cao Nhat Linh. Analytics and Control. 2025; 29(4): 293-302.
17. Zyablov A.N., Khalzova S.A., Sele-menev V.F. News of universities. Chemistry and chemical technology. 2017; 60(7): 42-47. https://doi.org/10.6060/tcct.2017607.5595
18. Pham Thi Gam, Cao Nhat Linh, Zya-blov A.N., Nguyen Anh Tien. Factory labora-tory. Diagnostics of materials. 2025; 91(9): 28-35. https://doi.org/10.26896/1028-6861-2025-91-9-28-35
19. Scanning Probe Microscopy Image Pro-cessing Software «FemtoScan Online». M. Advanced Technologies Center. spm@nanoscopy.org
20. Pham Thi Gam, Pham Thi Bich Ngoc, Zyablov A.N. Sorbtsionnye i khromatografich-eskie protsessy. 2024; 24(6): 1031-1035. https://doi.org/10.17308/sorpchrom.2024.24/12590
21. Hogarth C.A., Iqbal T. Physica status solidi (a). 1981; 65(1): 11-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.2210650102
22. Pagnia H., Sotnik N. Physica status sol-idi (a). 1988; 108(1): 11-65. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.2211080102









