Influence of Anion-Exchange Membrane Structure and Feeding Solution Acidity on Tartrate Extraction Efficiency by Electrodialysis Method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17308/sorpchrom.2026.26/13708Keywords:
electrodialysis, tartrates, anion-exchange membranes, energy costs, transfer mechanismsAbstract
Electrodialysis (ED) is one of the most effective and environmentally friendly methods for extracting tartrates from wine wastewater. Expanding our understanding of this process and identifying the most cost-effective and resource-saving ED modes will facilitate its expansion and adaptation. This study focuses on two factors that can influence ED efficiency: the structure of the anion-exchange membranes responsible for tartrate extraction and the pH of the treated solution. The studies were conducted using a CJMA-3 homogeneous anion-exchange membrane and an MA-41P heterogeneous membrane, which were operated in model solutions (a mixture of tartrates and sodium chlorides) simulating tartrate-containing wastewater with pH 3.0 and pH 10.0. It was shown that the homogeneous membrane provides a higher degree of tartrate extraction from the model solution than the heterogeneous membrane. This membrane behavior is caused by steric hindrance arising during the movement of highly hydrated tartaric acid anions. At pH 10.0, the rate of transfer of these anions doubles compared to pH 3.0, but simultaneously, the duration of the ED required to reduce the mineralization of the model solution by 40% increases by 1.5 times. As a result, the energy consumption required for the extraction of tartrates from the model solution increases in the following order: (CJMA-3, pH 3.0) < (MA-41P, pH 3.0) < (CJMA-3, pH 10.0) < (MA-41P pH 10.0).
Downloads
References
1. Honarparvar S., Zhang X., Chen T., Alborzi A., Afroz K., Reible D. Membranes. 2021; 11(4): 246. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11040246
2. Mondor M., Ippersiel D., Lamarche F. In Green technologies in food production and processing. Boston, MA: Springer US. 2011: 295-326.
3. Bazinet L. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2005; 45(4): 307-326. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408690490489279
4. Vera E., Sandeaux J., Persin F., Pour-celly G., Dornier M., Ruales J. J. Membr. Sci. 2009; 326(2): 472-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.10.034
5. Lasanta C., Gómez J. TFST. 2012; 28(1): 52-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2012.06.005
6. Wei R., Wang L., Ding Y., Zhang L., Gao F., Chen N., Song Y., Li H., Wang H. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023; 63(26): 8249-8260. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2022.2055528
7. Igliński B., Kiełkowska U., Piechota G. Clean. Technol. Environ. Policy. 2022; 24(7): 2061-2079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-022-02316-y
8. Cournoyer A., Bazinet L. Membranes. 2023; 13(2): 205. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13020205
9. Bazinet L., Geoffroy T.R. Membranes. 2020; 10(9): 221. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes10090221
10. Nichka V. S., Nikonenko V. V., Ba-zinet L. Membranes. 2021; 11(7): 534. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11070534
11. Liu F., Zhou R., Zhang C., Wu Z., Ren H., Ng H.Y. Chem. Eng. J. 2024; 479: 147588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.147588
12. Bdiri, M., Perreault, V., Mikhaylin, S., Larchet, C., Hellal, F., Bazinet, L., Dammak, L. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020; 233: 115995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.115995
13. Shehzad M.A., Yasmin A., Ge X., Wu L., Xu T. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2021; 6(10) 2001171. https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.202001171
14. Ran J., Wu L., He Y., Yang Z., Wang Y., Jiang C., Ge L., Bakangura E., Xu T. J. Memb. Sci. 2017; 522: 267-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.09.033
15. Pismenskaya N., Rybalkina O., Sol-onchenko K., Pasechnaya E., Sarapulova V., Wang Y., Jiang C., Xu T., Nikonenko V. Pol-ymers. 2023; 15: 2288. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15102288
16. Sarapulova V., Pismenskaya N., Ti-torova V., Sharafan M., Wang Y., Xu T., Zhang Y., Nikonenko, V. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(3): 1415. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22031415
17. Monopolar membranes. Available at: http://azotom.ru/monopolyarnye-membrany/
18. Knyaginicheva, Ye. V., Belashova Ye. D., Sarapulova V. V., Pismenskaya N. D. Kondensi-rovannie sredi i mezhfaznie granitsi. 2014; 16(3): 282-287. (In Russ.)
19. Ponomar M., Krasnyuk E., Butylskii D., Nikonenko V., Wang Y., Jiang C., Xu T., Pismenskaya, N. Membranes. 2022; 12(8): 765. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12080765
20. Pasechnaya E., Tsygurina K., Ponomar M., Chuprynina D., Nikonenko V., Pismen-skaya N. Membranes. 2023; 13(84): 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13010084
21. Epsztein R., Shaulsky E., Qin M., Elimelech M. J. Memb. Sci. 2019; 580: 316-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.02.009
22. Li F., Guo Y., Wang S. Membranes. 2022; 12(6): 610. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12060610
23. Zabolotsky V.I., Nikonenko V.V. Memb. Sci. 1993; 79(2-3): 181-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(93)85115-D
24. Sarapulova V., Nevakshenova E., Pismenskaya N., Dammak L., Nikonenko V. J. Memb. Sci. 2015; 479: 28-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.01.015
25. Lu Y., Hao T., Yan M., Han J., Tan Z., Yan Y. J. Chem. Eng. Data. 2014; 59(6): 1843-1851. https://doi.org/10.1021/je500009h
26. Laucirica G., Pérez-Mitta G., Toimil-Molares M.E., Trautmann C., Marmisollé W.A., Azzaroni O. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019; 123(47): 28997-29007. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b07977
27. Zabolotskiy V.I., But A.Yu., Vasil’eva V.I., Akberova E.M., Melnikov S.S. J. Memb, Sci. 2017; 526: 60-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.12.028
28. Pismenskaya N.D., Rybalkina O.A., Kozmai A.E., Tsygurina K.A., Melnikova E.D., Nikonenko V.V. J. Membr. Sci., 2020; 601: 117920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.117920
29. Helfferich F. G., Ion Exchange, McGraw-Hil, New York, 1962.
