Многокритериальная оценка эффективности группового полета летательных аппаратов с помощью мультипликативной формы
Ключевые слова:
обслуживание заявок, динамическое программирование, компьютерное моделирование, критерий оценки эффективности
Аннотация
Рассматривается многокритериальная задача оценки эффективности группового полета пилотируемой и беспилотной авиации при обслуживании потока заявок. С помощью динамического программирования сформирована модель назначения динамических приоритетов, оценивающих важность обслуженных заявок. Осуществлен выбор единого критерия оценки эффективности в мультипликативной форме, в которой количество сомножителей равно числу учитываемых факторов. Компьютерное моделирование показало преимущество в эффективности планирования с помощью мультипликативной формы по сравнению с аддитивной за счет повышения суммарной важности обслуженных объектов в маршрутном полете.
Скачивания
Данные скачивания пока не доступны.
Литература
1. Sobol I. M., Statnikov R. B. Selection of the optimal parameters in problems with many criteria. Moscow : Science, 1981. 110 p.
2. Lebedev G. N., Efimov A. V. Application of the dynamic programming for the fixed point flight routing at the monitoring of the ground situation in the controlled region. Mechatronics, automation, control. 2012. No 1. P. 63–70.
3. Baker F. B., Kim S. H. Item Response Theory: Parameter Estimation Techniques. NY : CRC Press, 2004. 528 p.
4. Kang T., Cohen A. S. IRT Model Selection Methods for Dichotomous Items. Applies Psychological Measurement. 2007. V. 31. N 4. P. 331–358. DOI
5. Chalmers R. P. Mirt: A Multidimensional Item Response Theory Package for the R Environment. Journal of Statistical Software. 2012. V. 48. N 6. P. 1–29. DOI
6. Claeskens G., Hjort N. L. Model Selection and Model Averaging. NY : Cambridge University Press, 2008. 332 p.
7. Ayala R. J. The Theory and Practice of Item Response Theory. NY : Guilford Press, 2009. 448 p. DOI: 10.1007/s11336-010-9179-z
8. Lebedev G. N., Romanov O. V., Alexeev A. Yu. Problems of the computer systems construction for training of the rocket and space systems specialists. Aerospace Instrumentation. 2003. No 9. P. 25–31.
9. Kanushkin S. V. [et al.] Preparation of the operators of the trouble-free control of the complex movable objects at the regulated inspection procedure. Mechatronics, automation, control. 2012. No 3. P. 67–70.
10. Shukshunov V. E., Tsifiev V. V., Pototsky S. I. Gym complexes and simulators. Development technologies and operation experience. Moscow : Mashinostroenie, 2005. 384 p.
11. Kuznetsova T. I., Tsaregorodtseva M. G. Problem setting of the optimal time choice at independent studying of the foreign language sections in a computer class taking into account the uneven complexity of the tasks and individual features of the students in the student group (in Russian). Modern technologies in problems of control, automation and information processing: a collection of articles of XXV International scientific and technical conference. Alushta, 2016. P. 209.
12. Lebedev G. N., Vu S. D. Application of the dynamic programming at the automated training of the air traffic control operators. 2011. No 44. 6 p.
13. Petrushin, V. A. Intellectual teaching systems. Izvestia NA. Technical cybernetics. 1993. No 2. P. 164–190.
14. Lebedev G. N., Tin P. Ch., Chan V. T. Solution of the dynamic programming problem at a safe by-product motion of the aircrafts. Proc. of MAI. 2012. No 54. 7 p.
15. Lebedev G. N., Efimov A. V., Mikhailin D. A. Estimation of the drone aircraft state vector at presence of the nonlinear elements in the control object. Vestnik of Moscow Aviation Institute. 2012. No 1. – P. 12–16.
16. Lebedev G. N. [et al.] Optimal control and safety control of the aircrafts and river vessels transverse motion at their routes crossing. Mechatronics, automation, control. 2012. No 12. P. 50–53.
17. Bellman R. Dynamic programming. Moscow : Publishing house of foreign literature. 1960. 161 p.
18. Zaitsev A. V., Kanushkin S. V. Multi-criteria of quality estimation of operator’s control of robotic complexes. Collection of works of the participants of VII VNPK “Modern continuous education and innovative development”. Under edition of A. N. Tsarkova and I. A. Bugakov. Serpukhov : MOU “IIF”. 2017. P. 841–844.
19. Kuznetsova T. I., Tsaregorodtseva M. G. Complex quality estimation of foreign language studying in the form of sum of the additive and multiplying convolution of the separate indexes of mastering of the various sections at all stages of training. Modern technologies in problems of management, automatics and information processing: a collection of articles of XXV International scientific and technical conference. 2016. P. 208.
20. Goncharenko V. I. [et al.] Selection of the set of the priority ground objects of observation with the help of the unmanned air vehicles and routing of their flight. Vestnik of computer and information technologies. 2019. No 2. P. 3–12. DOI
21. Kuznetsov A. V. [et al.] Quasi-optimal distribution of avionics on the basis of the cellular automaton and the ant algorithm. Vestnik Voronezh. str. Ser. System analysis and information technologies. 2017. No 4. P. 38–45.
2. Lebedev G. N., Efimov A. V. Application of the dynamic programming for the fixed point flight routing at the monitoring of the ground situation in the controlled region. Mechatronics, automation, control. 2012. No 1. P. 63–70.
3. Baker F. B., Kim S. H. Item Response Theory: Parameter Estimation Techniques. NY : CRC Press, 2004. 528 p.
4. Kang T., Cohen A. S. IRT Model Selection Methods for Dichotomous Items. Applies Psychological Measurement. 2007. V. 31. N 4. P. 331–358. DOI
5. Chalmers R. P. Mirt: A Multidimensional Item Response Theory Package for the R Environment. Journal of Statistical Software. 2012. V. 48. N 6. P. 1–29. DOI
6. Claeskens G., Hjort N. L. Model Selection and Model Averaging. NY : Cambridge University Press, 2008. 332 p.
7. Ayala R. J. The Theory and Practice of Item Response Theory. NY : Guilford Press, 2009. 448 p. DOI: 10.1007/s11336-010-9179-z
8. Lebedev G. N., Romanov O. V., Alexeev A. Yu. Problems of the computer systems construction for training of the rocket and space systems specialists. Aerospace Instrumentation. 2003. No 9. P. 25–31.
9. Kanushkin S. V. [et al.] Preparation of the operators of the trouble-free control of the complex movable objects at the regulated inspection procedure. Mechatronics, automation, control. 2012. No 3. P. 67–70.
10. Shukshunov V. E., Tsifiev V. V., Pototsky S. I. Gym complexes and simulators. Development technologies and operation experience. Moscow : Mashinostroenie, 2005. 384 p.
11. Kuznetsova T. I., Tsaregorodtseva M. G. Problem setting of the optimal time choice at independent studying of the foreign language sections in a computer class taking into account the uneven complexity of the tasks and individual features of the students in the student group (in Russian). Modern technologies in problems of control, automation and information processing: a collection of articles of XXV International scientific and technical conference. Alushta, 2016. P. 209.
12. Lebedev G. N., Vu S. D. Application of the dynamic programming at the automated training of the air traffic control operators. 2011. No 44. 6 p.
13. Petrushin, V. A. Intellectual teaching systems. Izvestia NA. Technical cybernetics. 1993. No 2. P. 164–190.
14. Lebedev G. N., Tin P. Ch., Chan V. T. Solution of the dynamic programming problem at a safe by-product motion of the aircrafts. Proc. of MAI. 2012. No 54. 7 p.
15. Lebedev G. N., Efimov A. V., Mikhailin D. A. Estimation of the drone aircraft state vector at presence of the nonlinear elements in the control object. Vestnik of Moscow Aviation Institute. 2012. No 1. – P. 12–16.
16. Lebedev G. N. [et al.] Optimal control and safety control of the aircrafts and river vessels transverse motion at their routes crossing. Mechatronics, automation, control. 2012. No 12. P. 50–53.
17. Bellman R. Dynamic programming. Moscow : Publishing house of foreign literature. 1960. 161 p.
18. Zaitsev A. V., Kanushkin S. V. Multi-criteria of quality estimation of operator’s control of robotic complexes. Collection of works of the participants of VII VNPK “Modern continuous education and innovative development”. Under edition of A. N. Tsarkova and I. A. Bugakov. Serpukhov : MOU “IIF”. 2017. P. 841–844.
19. Kuznetsova T. I., Tsaregorodtseva M. G. Complex quality estimation of foreign language studying in the form of sum of the additive and multiplying convolution of the separate indexes of mastering of the various sections at all stages of training. Modern technologies in problems of management, automatics and information processing: a collection of articles of XXV International scientific and technical conference. 2016. P. 208.
20. Goncharenko V. I. [et al.] Selection of the set of the priority ground objects of observation with the help of the unmanned air vehicles and routing of their flight. Vestnik of computer and information technologies. 2019. No 2. P. 3–12. DOI
21. Kuznetsov A. V. [et al.] Quasi-optimal distribution of avionics on the basis of the cellular automaton and the ant algorithm. Vestnik Voronezh. str. Ser. System analysis and information technologies. 2017. No 4. P. 38–45.
Опубликован
2020-06-15
Как цитировать
Лебедев, Г. Н., Михайлин, Д. А., Царева, О. Ю., & Чернякова, М. Е. (2020). Многокритериальная оценка эффективности группового полета летательных аппаратов с помощью мультипликативной формы. Вестник ВГУ. Серия: Системный анализ и информационные технологии, (2), 25-36. https://doi.org/10.17308/sait.2020.2/2913
Выпуск
Раздел
Математические методы системного анализа и управления
- Авторы сохраняют за собой авторские права и предоставляют журналу право первой публикации работы, которая по истечении 6 месяцев после публикации автоматически лицензируется на условиях Creative Commons Attribution License , которая позволяет другим распространять данную работу с обязательным сохранением ссылок на авторов оригинальной работы и оригинальную публикацию в этом журнале.
- Авторы имеют право размещать их работу в сети Интернет (например в институтском хранилище или персональном сайте) до и во время процесса рассмотрения ее данным журналом, так как это может привести к продуктивному обсуждению и большему количеству ссылок на данную работу (См. The Effect of Open Access).
