A model methodology for sustainable lending in the agricultural sector
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17308/econ.2024.2/11846Keywords:
sustainable development, sustainable finance, ESG, sustainable development credit products, responsible bankingAbstract
Subject. Processes of internal institutionalisation and state regulation of the sustainable lending market in the agricultural sector, as well as the ESG transformation of business processes of lenders and borrowers within the framework of the concept of sustainable development.
Objectives. The formation of a conceptual framework for sustainable lending and forecasting scenarios for its development in the agricultural sector; development of a model methodology providing a structural restructuring of the industry credit mechanism in terms of incorporating sustainable development goals and ESG factors into the credit procedures of banks and the business processes of borrowers, increasing the supply of relevant credit products, and creating a system of market and government incentives.
Methodology. The developed model methodology for sustainable lending is based on the concepts of sustainable development, ESG, responsible banking, and sustainable finance. In order to achieve the objectives, the author used abstraction, generalisation, formalisation, analogies, and scenario forecasting methods.
Results. It was shown that the concept of sustainable development and the principles of responsible banking form the basis of sustainable financing, the direction of which is sustainable lending. A conceptual apparatus of sustainable lending has been formed, which allows classifying it as a financial instrument for achieving sustainable development goals.
Conclusions. Based on scenario forecasting, an acceleration model for the formation of a sustainable lending market in the agricultural sector is substantiated. The model assumes a proactive role of the state and banks (promotion of values, incentives), consolidation of institutional changes, and infrastructure development. A model methodology for sustainable lending in the agricultural sector, including three structural components: information, product and incentive system has been developed. The information component performs the functions of goal setting, consolidation in formal norms and regulation of institutional changes, incorporation of ESG factors into standard credit scoring procedures, and development of the market for non-financial ESG products. The product component is differentiated by types of sustainable development credit products. Standardised loan products, including government support measures, are offered for verified projects. For projects financed according to bank standards, unique loan products are offered with internal financial and non-financial incentives, restrictions and ESG risk management tools integrated into their structure. The incentive system is differentiated into financial and non-financial based on the types of credit products.
Downloads
References
Васильева, Е.Ю., Бакрунов, Ю.О. (2022) Перспективы развития ESG-финансирования как инновационного подхода к привлечению ресурсов компаниями России. Управленческий учет, (4-3), 544–551. [Vasilyeva, E.Yu., Bakrunov, Yu.O. (2022) Prospects for the development of ESG financing as an innovative approach to attracting resources by Russian companies. Management Accounting, (4-3), 544–551. (In Russian).] https://doi.org/10.25806/uu4-32022544-551
Евлахова, Ю.С. (2022). ESG-факторы в оценке репутационных рисков крупнейших российских банков. Вестник СПбГУ. Экономика, 38(3), 385–415. [Evlakhova, Yu.S. (2022). ESG factors in assessing reputational risks of the largest Russian banks. Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. Economics, 38(3), 385–415. (In Russian).] https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu05.2022.303
Ефимова, Е.Г., Мальцев, А.А. & Чупина, Д.А. (2023). «Зеленая» повестка в современной практике стран и регионов: в поисках единого подхода. Вестник СПбГУ. Экономика, 39(1), 55–72. [Efimova, E.G., Maltsev, A.A. & Chupina, D.A. (2023). “Green” agenda in modern practice of countries and regions: in search of a unified approach. Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. Economics, 39(1), 55–72. (In Russian).] https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu05.2023.103
Кабир, Л.С. (2019). Государственная поддержка «зеленых» инвестиций и рыночное «зеленое» финансирование: зарубежный опыт. Инноватика и экспертиза, (1), 97–108. [Kabir, L.S. (2019). State support for green investments and market-based green financing: foreign experience. Innovation and Expertise, (1), 97–108. (In Russian).]
Коробейников, Д.А. (2022). Эволюция подходов к льготному кредитованию АПК в постсоветский период. Региональная экономика. Юг России, 10(2), 143-151. [Korobeinikov, D.A. (2022). The evolution of approaches to preferential lending to the agro-industrial complex in the post-Soviet period. Regional economy. South of Russia, 10(2), 143-151. (In Russian).] https://doi.org/10.15688/re.volsu.2022.2.14
Коробейникова, О.М. & Стефанович, Л.И. (2023). ESG и энергоэффективность в fintech-отраслях: нужны ли новые подходы? Энергетика и цифровизация: теория и практика трансформации. Материалы II Международной научно-практической конференции. (Волгоград, 25 ноября 2022 г.), 84–90. [Korobeynikova, O.M. & Stefanovich, L.I. (2023). ESG and energy efficiency in fintech industries: are new approaches needed? Energy and digitalization: theory and practice of transformation. Materials of the II International Scientific and Practical Conference. (Volgograd, November 25, 2022), 84–90. (In Russian).]
Лысунец, М.В. (2023). Углеродное ценообразование как инструмент трансграничного углеродного регулирования и «зеленой» трансформации мировой экономики. Мир новой экономики, 17(2), 27–36. [Lysunets, M.V. (2023). Carbon pricing as a tool for transboundary carbon regulation and “green” transformation of the world economy. The World of New Economics, 17(2), 27–36. (In Russian).] https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2023-17-2-27-36
Мирошниченко, О.С. & Мостовая, Н.А. (2019) «Зеленый» кредит как инструмент «зеленого» финансирования. Финансы: теория и практика, 23(2), 31–43. [Miroshnichenko, O.S. & Mostovaya, N.A. (2019) “Green” loan as a tool for “green” financing. Finance: Theory and Practice, 23(2), 31–43. (In Russian).] https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2019-23-2-31-43
Плотников, В.А & Сущева, Н.В. (2022). Ответственное финансирование и корпоративное управление. Известия Санкт-Петербургского государственного экономического университета, (5-1), 36–41. [Plotnikov, V.A. & Sushcheva, N.V. (2022). Responsible financing and corporate governance. News of the St. Petersburg State University of Economics, (5-1), 36–41. (In Russian).]
Просвирина, И.И. & Довбий, Н.С. (2020). Выбор источников традиционного и «зеленого» финансирования наилучших доступных технологий. Финансовый журнал, 12(4), 101–116. [Prosvirina, I.I. & Dovbiy, N.S. (2020). Selecting sources of traditional and green financing for the best available technologies. Financial Journal, 12(4), 101–116. (In Russian).] https://doi.org/10.31107/2075-1990-2020-4-101-116.
Тарасова, Ю.А. & Ляшко, Е.И. (2023). Влияние институциональных факторов на выпуск зеленых облигаций: экскурс в 2021 год. Финансовый журнал, 15(2), 90–102. [Tarasova, Yu.A. & Lyashko, E.I. (2023). The influence of institutional factors on the issuance of green bonds: an excursion into 2021. Financial Journal, 15(2), 90–102. (In Russian).] https://doi.org/10.31107/2075-1990-2023-2-90-102
Шушкевич, А. (2022). Зеленое и устойчивое финансирование как перспективный механизм привлечения иностранных инвестиций в Республику Беларусь. Банковский вестник, (3), 24–35. [Shushkevich, A. (2022). Green and sustainable financing as a promising mechanism for attracting foreign investment to the Republic of Belarus. Banking Bulletin, (3), 24–35. (In Russian).]
Bukhari, S.A., Hashim, F. & Amran, A. (2020). Green banking: A road map for adoption. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 36(3), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoes-11-2019-0177.
Chiaramonte, L., Dreassi, A., Girardone, C. & Pisera, S. (2021). Do ESG strategies enhance bank stability during financial turmoil? Evidence from Europe. The European Journal of Finance, 28(12), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2021.1964556
Houston, J.F. & Shan, H. (2019). Corporate ESG Profiles and Banking Relationships. SSRN Electronic Journal. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3331617
Luo, C., Fan, S. & Zhang, Q. (2017). Investigating the influence of green credit on operational efficiency and financial performance based on hybrid econometric models. International Journal of Financial Studies, 5(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs5040027
Tarkhanova, E.A. & Fricler, A.V. (2020). Green financing: Global understandings and Russian practices review. Journal of New Economy, 21(4), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.29141/2658-5081-2020-21-4-3
Tommaso, C. & Thornton, J. (2020). Do ESG scores effect bank risk taking and value? Evidence from European banks. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(5), 2286–2298. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1964
Vorobyov, Yu.N., Burkaltseva, D.D., Betskov, A.V., Kilyaskhanov Kh.Sh., Vorobieva, E.I., Blazhevich, O.G., Smirnova, E.A. & Kuryanova, I.V. (2019). Investment in agriculture: methodology and assessment. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(2), 4680-4684. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B3509.078219
Xi, B., Wang, Y. & Yang, M. (2022). Green credit, green reputation, and corporate financial performance: evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, (29), 2401–2419. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-352635/v1
