The format of joint offset public procurement as a demand factor collectively generated by the regions of Russia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17308/econ.2024.4/12528Keywords:
contractual system, contract with counter investment obligations, management model, centralisation of purchases, innovative productsAbstract
Subject. The subject of this study was the analysis of joint offset transactions implemented by government customers during the valid period of the relevant legislation on the contractual system.
Purpose. The paper analyses the theoretical foundations of joint tenders for the conclusion of offset contracts and also compares them with other joint procedures provided for by the contractual legislation of the Russian Federation, provides an analysis of completed purchases for the execution of transactions with counter investment obligations and an expert assessment of projects implemented in this paradigm.
Methodology. In this work we used empirical research methods and the method of content analysis. Its application is aimed at studying the content of notifications on joint offset tenders, the data on which is available in the Unified Information System in the field of procurement, and documents regarding other competitive procedures.
Conclusions. The conducted study confirms the concerns of the Antimonopoly Service of Russia that intersubject joint contracts are disavowed as a tool for the development of the innovation sector and import substituting industries. The subjects of the concluded contracts relate to competitively capacious commodity markets, which does not allow implementing the principle of competition development. This requires a revision of approaches to meeting the customers’ needs for products through the conclusion of contracts with counter investment obligations and management of the public procurement industry with their help. The legislatively specified goal of the process of purchasing goods, works, and services at the expense of budgetary funds is not to narrow the capacity of bidders, but, on the contrary, to become a business lift for economic agents.
Downloads
References
Беляева, А. А., Светлова, О. И., & Москаленко, Л. П. (2024). Сравнительный анализ механизмов формирования благоприятной предпринимательской среды для реализации проектов государственно-частного партнерства. Московский экономический журнал, 9(4), 714–720. [Belyaeva, A. A., Svetlova, O. I., & Moskalenko, L. P. (2024). Comparative analysis of the mechanisms of formation of a favorable business environment for the implementation of public-private partnership projects. Moscow economic journal, 9(4), 714–720. (In Russian).] https://doi.org/10.55186/2413046X_2024_9_4_229
Бойчук, А. В. (2024). Инструменты привлечения инвестиций в экономику региона в условиях санкций: реализация инфраструктурных проектов с помощью офсетных контрактов. Финансовые рынки и банки, (1), 63–68. [Boychuk, A.V. (2024). Offset contract in favor of a single supplier as a mechanism for building import substitution and investments in healthcare. Russian Economic Bulletin, (1), 63–68. (In Russian).]
Бонюшко, Н. А., & Спирин, А. А. (2024). Офсетные контракты как фактор повышения качества промышленной политики субъектов Российской Федерации. Вестник факультета управления СПбГЭУ, (17), 15–25. [Bonyushko, N. A., & Spirin, A. A. (2024). Offset Contracts as a Factor in Improving the Quality of Industrial Policy of the Subjects of the Russian Federation. Bulletin of the Faculty of Management of Saint-Petersburg State University of Economics, (17), 15–25. (In Russian).]
Бронников, А. М., & Гуляева, А. С. (2023). Предиктивный анализ на стадии планирования государственных контрактов со встречными инвестиционными обязательствами. Экономика: вчера, сегодня, завтра, 13(4-1), 415–421. [Bronnikov, A. M., & Gulyaeva, A.S. (2023). Predictive analysis at the stage of planning government contracts with counter investment obligations. Economy: yesterday, today, tomorrow, 13(4-1), 415–421. (In Russian).] https://doi.org/10.34670/AR.2023.72.44.051
Доржиева, О. Ю. (2006). Недостаток инновационной активности как причина низкой инвестиционной привлекательности региона. Инновации, (11), 65. [Dorzhieva, O. Yu. (2006). Lack of Innovative Activity as a Reason for the Low Investment Attractiveness of the Region. Innovations, (11), 65. (In Russian).]
Еремин, С. Г. (2023). Роль офсетных контрактов в доказательной политике аудита эффективности правового механизма регулирования государственных контрактов. Право и экономика, (4), 34–39. [Yeremin, S.G. (2023). The role of offset contracts in the evidence-based policy on the performance audit of the legal mechanism for regulating government contracts. Law and economics, (4), 34–39. (In Russian).]
Климанова, Т. В. (2023a). Трансформация подходов к управлению тематическими закупками на примере борьбы с борщевиком Сосновского. Актуальные проблемы экономики и менеджмента, (4), 15–25. [Klimanova, T.V. (2023a). Тransformation of approaches to the management of thematic purchases on the example of the fight against Sosnovsky's hogweed. Current issues in economics and management, (4), 15–25. (In Russian).]
Климанова, Т. В. (2023b). Централизация от обратного: управляющим центром госзакупок становится единственный поставщик. Экономика: теория и практика, (2), 99–103. [Klimanova, T.V. (2023b). Centralization from the Reverse: The Sole Supplier Becomes the Managing Center of State Procurement. Economics: Theory and Practice, (2), 99–103. (In Russian).] https://doi.org/10.31429/2224042X_2023_70_99.
Корягин, В. В. (2023). Офсетные контракты, как инструмент развития импортозамещения. Комплексное развитие территориальных систем и повышение эффективности регионального управления в условиях цифровизации экономики: Материалы V Национальной (всероссийской) научно-практической конференции. Орёл, 2023, 136–145. [Koryagin, V. V. (2023). Offset Contracts as a Tool for Import Substitution Development. Integrated Development of Territorial Systems and Enhancement of Regional Management Efficiency in the Context of Economic Digitalization: Proceedings of the V National (All-Russian) Scientific and Practical Conference. Oryol, 2023, 136–145. (In Russian).]
Очак, П. К., & Мамий, С. А. (2021). Конкуренция и монополия. Colloquium-Journal, (10-2), 29–31. [Ochak, P. K., & Mami, S. A. (2021). Competition and Monopoly. Colloquium-Journal, (10-2), 29–31. (In Russian).]
Смирнова, И. В., & Бизенкова, А. А. (2023). Проблемы управления в сфере закупок для обеспечения государственных и муниципальных нужд. Научный журнал НИУ ИТМО. Серия: Экономика и экологический менеджмент, (2), 125–128. [Smirnova, I. V., & Bizenko, A. A. (2023). Issues of Management in the Procurement Sector for Ensuring State and Municipal Needs. Scientific Journal of ITMO University. Series: Economics and Environmental Management, (2), 125–128. (In Russian).] https://doi.org/10.17586/2310-1172-2023-16-2-122-128.
Трофимова, Е. О. (2019). Оценка потенциального влияния заключенных офсетных контрактов на конкурентную ситуацию в сегменте госзакупок. Инновации в здоровье нации: Сборник материалов VII Всероссийской научно-практической конференции с международным участием. Санкт-Петербург, 2019, 401–406. [Trofimova, E. O. (2019). Assessment of the Potential Impact of Concluded Offset Contracts on the Competitive Situation in the Public Procurement Segment. Innovations in Nation's Health: Collection of Materials from the VII All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with International Participation. St. Petersburg, 2019, 401–406. (In Russian).]
Хлынин, Э. В., & Дробот, Е.С. (2022). Офсетный контракт (договор) как способ поддержки малого и среднего бизнеса в России. Вектор экономики, (9). [Khlynin, E.V., & Drobot, E.S. (2022). Offset contract (agreement) as a way to support small and medium business in Russia. Vector Economy, (9). (In Russian).]
Taylor, T. K. (2003). The proper use of offsets in international procurement. Journal of public procurement, 3, 338–356.
Matthews, R., & Anicetti, J. (2021). Offset in a Post-Brexit World. The RUSI Journal, 166(5), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2021.2017592.
Cesko, J., & Søs, K. (2022). Collaboration Between Economic Operators in the Competition for Public Contracts. A Legal and Economic Analysis of Grey Zones between EU Public Procurement Law and EU Competition Law. Frederiksberg : Copenhagen Business School.
Racca, G. M., & Yukins, C. R. (2019). Joint Public Procurement and Innovation Lessons Across Borders
Taylor, T. K. (2024). Using Procurement Offsets as an Economic Development Strategy. In: Dunne, B., Dunne, P. (eds.). Arms Trade and Economic Development. London & New York: Routledge, 30–43. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203392300.
Taylor, T. K. (2015). Procurement: Offset Contracts. In: Bearfield, D., Berman, E., & Dubnick, M. Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy, 5, 137–144.
