Global experience application of emissions trading systems: theoretical and empirical analysis
Abstract
Importance: world experience in the application of emission trading systems in the context of theoretical and empirical aspects of the study. Purpose: to highlight the features of the functioning of emission trading systems, determine the advantages of individual systems, and also evaluate the results of using these systems in practice. Research design: the main elements of emission permit trading systems used in various countries are considered, the features of the functioning of regulated and voluntary markets are highlighted, and the mechanisms for the distribution of emission permits are analyzed. Results: the authors highlighted the advantages and disadvantages of the emission trading systems used in modern practice in various countries, and examined the features of the permit trading system emerging in Russia. The justifiable reasons for using emission trading systems include the opportunity for effective exchange, the possibility of an environmental group spending its own resources to reduce environmental pollution by others, and a focus on the efficient use of pollutants without the need for a direct assessment of public costs of pollution, etc.
Downloads
References
2. Михайлова М.В., Кувикова П.М. Концепции устойчивого развития и ESG как национальные приоритеты государственного управления в условиях макроэкономической турбулентности // Материалы V национальной научно-практической конференции «Теория и практика управления государственными функциями и услугами. Тарифное регулирование». Санкт-Петербург , 2022, с. 123-127.
3. Салиева Р.Н. Государственное регулирование в сфере ограничения выбросов парниковых газов в условиях перехода к низкоуглеродной энергетике в Российской Федерации // Правовой энергетический форум, 2022, no. 3, с. 17-26.
4. Скоков Р.Ю., Гузенко М.А. Проекты энергосбережения и энергоэффективности в Сахалинской области в условиях пилотного углеродного регулирования // Материалы II Международной научно-практической конференции «Энергетика и цифровизация: теория и практика трансформации». Волгоград, 2023, с. 4-17.
5. Anderson B., Di Maria C. Abatement and Allocation in the Pilot Phase of the EU ETS. // Environ Resource Econ, 2011, no. 48, pp. 83-103.
6. Cramton P., Kerr S. Tradeable carbon permit auctions: How and why to auction not grandfather // Energy policy, 2002, no. 30 (4), pp. 333-345.
7. Fischer C., Parry I., Pizer W. Instrument choice for environmental protection when technological innovation is endogenous // Journal of environmental economics and management, 2003, no. 45 (3), pp. 523- 545.
8. Grubb M., Neuhoff K. Allocation and competitiveness in the EU emissions trading scheme: policy overview // Climate Policy, 2006, no. 6, pp. 7-30.
9. Rogge K., Schneider M., Hoffmann V. The innovation impact of the EU Emission Trading System — Findings of company case studies in the German power sector // Ecological Economics, 2011, Vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 513-523.
10. Stavins R.N. What Can We Learn from the Grand Policy Experiment? Lessons from SO2 Allowance Trading // The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1998, no. 12 (3), pp. 69-88.
11. Tuerk A., Mehling M., Flachsland Chr. & Sterk W. Linking carbon markets: concepts, case studies and pathways // Climate Policy, 2009, no. 9, pp. 341-357.
12. Zetterberg L., Wråke M., Sterner T. et al. Short-Run Allocation of Emissions Allowances and Long-Term Goals for Climate Policy // Ambio 4, 2012, no. 1, pp. 23-32.
