Information support of the accounting system of agribusiness entities in terms of depreciat ion of fixed assets

  • Elena Ivanovna Kostyukova Stavropolsky State Agrarian University
  • Olga Egorovna Sytnik Stavropolsky State Agrarian University
  • Alexander Vitalievich Frolov Stavropolsky State Agrarian University
Keywords: accounting, non-current assets, fixed assets, cost, depreciation, agriculture

Abstract

Importance: аgribusiness companies today operate in conditions of a certain level of uncertainty. This is due to the consequences of the Covid 19 pandemic, sanctions pressure on business, the consequences of political
events and other external factors that affect the value of the company’s assets. The information generated in the company’s financial statements must meet the qualitative characteristics outlined in the Conceptual Framework for the Presentation of Financial Statements – relevance, truthful presentation, prudence, comparability, etc. The existing realities of the business environment provide many new opportunities for the development of economic entities. With the improvement of the operating conditions of enterprises, the need to improve the management apparatus of production and economic activities is becoming more acute, in terms of strengthening internal control over the movement of inventory, cash, and strengthening the security of the company’s assets. The basis of these improvements, first of all, is the high-quality organization of the accounting and internal audit system in the company. Purpose: to determine the parameters of the information support of the company’s accounting system regarding the procedure for depreciation of fixed assets. Research design: within the framework of the article, we have summarized various opinions, points of
view and existing experience in the field of impairment procedures for fixed assets. When reflecting the economic condition of agribusiness entities, it is necessary to take into account the local features of their functioning and clearly represent the risks that this business generates. Taking into account the combination of these factors, the issues considering the mechanisms / methods of conducting inspections for impairment of the company’s fixed assets are relevant, since their share in the asset structure of agricultural organizations reaches 50% or more. Results: оur findings extend previous research in a given area and conclude that the impairment test is a process that requires informed decisions when choosing the tools for its implementation and a critical assessment of the results obtained. The proposed research has theoretical and practical implications in various areas of decision-making related to accounting and company management

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Elena Ivanovna Kostyukova , Stavropolsky State Agrarian University

Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof.

Olga Egorovna Sytnik, Stavropolsky State Agrarian University

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Assoc. Prof.

Alexander Vitalievich Frolov, Stavropolsky State Agrarian University

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Assoc. Prof

References

1. Beatty A., Weber J. Accounting Discretion in Fair Value Estimates: An Examination of SFAS 142 Goodwill Impairments // Journal of Accounting Research, 2006, vol. 44, pp. 257-288 .
2. Drábková Z. The potential to reduce the risk of manipulation of financial statements using the identification models of creative accounting // Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 2013, no. 61 (7), pp. 2055-2063.
3. Henning S.L., Shaw W.H., Stock T. The Amount and Timing of Goodwill Writeoffs and Revaluations: Evidence from U.S. and U.K. Firms // Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2004, vol. 23, pp. 99-121.
4. Hilton S.A., O Brien P. Inco LTD: Market value, Fair value and Management Discretion // Journal of Accounting Reserch, 2009, vol. 47, no. 1.
5. Hinke J., Stárová M. The Fair Value Model for the Measurement of Biological Assets and Agricultural Produce in the Czech Republic // Procedia Economics and Finance, 2014, vol. 12, pp. 213-220.
6. Laskaridou E.C., Athanasios V. Detecting Asset Impairment Management: Some evidence from Food and Bever-age listed Companies // Procedia Technology, 2013, no. 8, pp. 493-497.
7. Lye A., Chye L., Tin Hoe Tan. Asset Write-offs – Managerial Incentives and Macroeconomics Factors // Abacus, 2002, vol. 38, no.1.
8. Paniagua Angel & Baker Kathleen. The socioeconomics of agriculture // Social and economic development, vol. I.
9. Piosik A.K., Rówińska M. Determinants of long-lived asset impairments // Evidence from Poland. Journal of economics & management, 2012, vol. 8, pp. 72-104 .
10. Piosik A., Rówińska M. Determinants of long-lived asset write-offs. Evidence from companies listed on the War-saw Stock Exchange in Warsaw // Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości, 2010, t. 55 (111), pp. 139-166.
11. Sytnik O.E., Kulish N.V., Khoruzhy V.I. Formation of accounting information about fixed assets in accounting in accordance with FSBU 6/2020 «FIXED ASSETS»: assessment, revaluation, procedure for calculating depreciation, impairment // Accounting in agriculture, 2022, vol. 5, pp. 330-340.
12. Tingey-Holyoak J., Cooper B., Crase L., Pisaniello J. A framework for supporting climate-exposed asset deci-sion-making in agriculture // Land Use Policy, 2024, vol. 137.
13. Wilson G.P. Discussion Write-Offs: Manipulation or Impairment? // Journal of Accounting Research, 1996, vol. 34, pp. 171-177.
Published
2024-09-13
How to Cite
Kostyukova , E. I., Sytnik, O. E., & Frolov, A. V. (2024). Information support of the accounting system of agribusiness entities in terms of depreciat ion of fixed assets. Modern Economics: Problems and Solutions, 8, 107-123. https://doi.org/10.17308/meps/2078-9017/2024/8/107-123
Section
Accounting, Audit and Economical Statistics