Determining the directions for developing a methodology for comprehensive assessment of ESG activity in China’s biopharmaceutical territorial-sectoral complexes

  • Oleg Viktorovich Bazhenov Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin
  • Olga Viktorovna Savostina Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Ural State Agrarian University
  • Zhun Chzhun Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin
Keywords: biopharmaceutical industry of China, system of indicators, rating assessment, comprehensive assessment, territorial features, ESG activity

Abstract

Importance: In recent years, ESG standards have attracted widespread attention worldwide, especially in the biopharmaceutical industry. As a key area related to human health, this industry requires increased social responsibility and special attention to potential environmental impacts. Purpose: to assess the current state of the ESG policy of the Chinese biopharmaceutical industry and identify areas for the development of a methodology for a comprehensive assessment of the state of ESG activity of biopharmaceutical territorial and industrial complexes in China. Research design: the object of research was briefly described – biopharmaceutical enterprises in China, followed by disclosure of the directions of their ESG activity in accordance with official corporate reporting data; the territorial features of the locations (provinces) of biopharmaceutical enterprises’ capacities were presented; the existing methods of integrated assessment of ESG activity of companies, based on the basis for calculating the relevant ratings by international and national Chinese agencies; Based on the identified gaps between the current directions of implementing the ESG policy of biopharmaceutical companies, the territorial features of their location and existing approaches, the directions for the development of a methodology for a comprehensive assessment of corporate ESG activity are formulated. In the course of solving the tasks set, a discrepancy was revealed between the ESG strategies of bio-pharmaceutical companies and existing integrated assessment methods, and in some cases the regional impact on business was not taken into account, which not only reduces the level of sustainable development of companies, but also affects the attitude of the main internal and external stakeholders to the industry under consideration. Results: based on the results of the study, targeted recommendations are proposed for optimizing the methodology for a comprehensive assessment of the state of ESG activity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Oleg Viktorovich Bazhenov, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin

Dr. Sc. (Econ.), Assoc. Prof.

Olga Viktorovna Savostina, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Ural State Agrarian University

Cand. Sc. (Econ.), Assoc. Prof.

Zhun Chzhun, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin

М.А.

References

1. Белик И.С., Дуцинин А.С., Никулина Н.Л. Влияние ESG-факторов на финансовое состояние и инвестиционную привлекательность российских публичных компаний // Управленец, 2022, Т. 13, no. 6, с. 44-55.
2. Громов П.П. Устойчивое развитие в горнодобывающем секторе: сравнение практик российских и китайских компаний // Горная промышленность, 2023, no. 5, с. 34-50.
3. Захматов Д.Ю., Валитов Г.Ш. Влияние ESG-факторов на рыночную капитализацию российских компаний // Сибирская финансовая школа, 2022, no. 3, с. 183-192.
4. Иванов А.А., Петрова Е.С. Сравнительный анализ ESG-трансформации нефтегазовых компаний России и Китая // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 6: Экономика, 2023, no. 4, с. 45-62.
5. Кузнецова О.Н., Ли С. ESG-раскрытие информации компаниями России и Китая: сравнительное исследование // Корпоративные финансы, 2024, Т. 18, no. 1, с. 112-128.
6. Смирнов В.Л. Особенности корпоративного управления в рамках ESG-стратегий: российский и китайский опыт // Экономика и управление, 2023, Т. 29, no. 8, с. 78-94.
7. Федорова М.И., Чжан Л. Влияние ESG-факторов на стоимость компаний: сопоставление российского и китайского рынков // Финансы и кредит, 2024, Т. 30, no. 2, с. 155-172.
8. Шаш Н.Н., Досаева Н.Д. Влияние социально ответственного инвестирования на финансовые показатели и стоимость компании // Revistă ştiinţifcă progresivă, 2020, Vol. 3, no. 2(4), с. 27-32.
9. Chen H., Zhang G. Industry-Specific ESG Disclosure Patterns in Chinese Manufacturing: Evidence from Automotive and Electronics Sectors // Sustainability Accounting Review, 2024, no. 1, pp. 78-92.
10. Chen L., Liu W. The Differential Impact of ESG Factors on Market Value Across Industries in China // Journal of Sustainable Finance, 2024, Vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 112-130.
11. Li X., Wang Y. ESG Implementation in China’s Renewable Energy Sector: A Comparative Study of Solar and Wind Industries // Journal of Clean Energy Development, 2023, Vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 45- 59.
12. Wang J., Li H. The Market Value Effect of ESG Performance in China’s Financial Sector: Empirical Evidence from Listed Companies // China Finance Review, 2023, Vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 34-52.
13. Wu J. Sectoral Analysis of ESG Performance in China’s Heavy Industries: Steel vs. Cement Production // China Industrial Economics, 2023, Vol. 41, no.8, pp. 112-126.
14. Yang R. Petrochemical Industry ESG Practices in China: Regional and Technological Factors // Energy Policy Research, 2023, Vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 155-170.
15. Yang S., Wu T. The Moderating Effect of ESG Ratings on Market Value in Chinese Technology Companies // Technology Innovation and Investment, 2024, no. 2, pp. 155-172.
16. Zhang Y. ESG Disclosure and Firm Valuation: Evidence from China’s Manufacturing Industry // Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 2023, no. 3, pp. 78- 95.
17. Zhou G., Liu L., Luo S. Sustainable development, ESG performance and company market value: Mediating effect of financial performance // Business Strategy and the Environment, 2022, Vol. 31, Is. 7, pp. 3371-3387.
18. Zhou L., Wei F. ESG Differentiation in China’s Tech Sector: Hardware Manufacturers vs. Digital Platforms // Asian Technology Management Journal, 2024, no. 2, pp. 34-48.
19. Zhou X. ESG Performance and Stock Price Volatility: Evidence from China’s Energy Sector // Energy Economics Letters, 2023, Vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 45–63.
Published
2025-12-25
How to Cite
Bazhenov, O. V., Savostina, O. V., & Chzhun, Z. (2025). Determining the directions for developing a methodology for comprehensive assessment of ESG activity in China’s biopharmaceutical territorial-sectoral complexes. Modern Economics: Problems and Solutions, 12, 61-74. https://doi.org/10.17308/meps/2078-9017/2025/12/61-74
Section
Accounting, Audit and Economical Statistics