Decoupling analysis in assessing corporate maturity in environmental sustainability: evidence from metallurgical and mining companies
Abstract
Importance: sustainable business development has attracted considerable attention from researchers and teams in the field of economics since the end of the 20th century. Existing corporate standards in this field, such as ESG (environmental, social, governance), require an assessment of companies’ sustainability maturity before they formulate their strategies. However, the decoupling concept proposed by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) between anthropogenic environmental impacts and resource use for economic growth has not been developed at the microeconomic level. Purpose: this paper proposes a method to assess the ESG maturity of a company by analysing the relationship between its operational, financial and non-financial performance, decoupling analysis. Research design: the method consists of three components: decoupling analyses of company data using a modified model of P. Tapio and N. Finel ‘The Decoupling Diamond’, analysing the dynamics of indicators contributing to the reduction of the company’s environmental impact, and assessing the transparency of disclosure of non-financial indicators in reporting. Results: based on the results, a classification of companies by the level of maturity of the E (environment) component into five stages in the categories of technogenic and sustainable types of development was proposed. The proposed methodology was tested on the data of metallurgical and mining companies in Russia, which, according to rating agencies, are leaders in the field of sustainable development. The results extend the possibilities to assess the company’s position on the sustainable development journey and to apply described methodology in strategic management.
Downloads
References
2. Аникина И.Д. Эколого-экономическое состояние регионов: совершенствование методологии и методики оценки / И.Д. Аникина, А.А. Аникин // Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Экономика, 2019, Т. 21, no. 4. c. 141-151.
3. Бобылев С.Н., Михайлова С.М., Кирюшин П.А. [и др.]. Зелёная экономика и цели устойчивого развития для России. Москва,Экономический факультет МГУ им. М.В. Ломоносова, 2019. 284 с.
4. Забелина И.А. Эколого-экономическое развитие регионов Востока России и Северо-Востока Китая: сравнительный анализ // Экология. Экономика. Информатика. Серия: Системный анализ и моделирование экономических и экологических систем, 2024, Т. 1, no. 9, c. 240-244.
5. Ложкина С. Л. Учетно-аналитическая оценка устойчивого эколого-социально-экономического развития хозяйствующего субъекта в условиях цифровизации / С.Л. Ложкина, Н.А. Гуревич // Экономические и гуманитарные науки, 2022, no. 12(371), c. 21-31.
6. Самарина В.П. «Зеленая экономика» России: некоторые вопросы теории и методологии // Национальные интересы: приоритеты и безопасность, 2015, Т. 11, no. 2 (287), c. 2-9.
7. Урасова А.А. Декаплинг как инструмент оценки устойчивого развития промышленного комплекса / А.А. Урасова, Л.В. Глезман, С.С. Федосеева // Экономика региона, 2024, Т. 20, no. 4, c. 1223- 1237.
8. Федосеева С.С. Оценка развития промышленного комплекса в условиях экологически ориентированной экономики / С.С. Федосеева, А.А. Урасова // Проблемы развития территории, 2024, Т. 28, no. 3, c. 67-81.
9. Фомина В.Ф. Выявление эффекта декаплинга в основных отраслях экономики Республики Коми // Экономические и социальные перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз, 2022, Т. 15, no. 1, c. 176- 193.
10. Finel N., Tapio P. Decoupling transport CO2 from GDP. [Электронный ресурс]. 2012. Доступно: https://www. utupub.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/ 147511/eBook_2012-1.pdf?sequence= 1&isAllowed=y (дата обращения: 02.07.2025).
11. Ginting K. & Oginawati K. (2024). Evaluation of Maturity in Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Risks Mitigation and Safety Climate in the Oil and Gas Company, Bojonegoro. European Journal of Development Studies, no. 4(4), рр. 25-31.
12. Kogdenko V.G. Substantiation of Parameters of Environmental Security and Sustainability of the Development of the Metallurgical Industry / V.G. Kogdenko, N.A. Kazakova // Studies on Russian Economic Development, 2023, Vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 115-123.
13. Serafeim G. et al. Where ESG fails // Institutional Investor, 2019, рр. 1-17. Доступно: https://www.institutionalinvestor. com/article/2bswdin8nvg922puxdzwg/ opinion/where-esg-fails (дата обращения: 02.07.2025).
14. Trentin L., Marques M. Environmental, social and governance [ESG] consulting model // Revista de Administração da UFSM, 2025, Т. 18, no. 1, р. 4.
15. Zabelina I.A. Decoupling in Environmental and Economic Development of Regions-Participants of Cross-Border Cooperation // Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2019. Vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 241-255.
