Ecological Network Model in Shahdagh National Park
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to explore the possibility of creating an ecological network that includes core areas, buffer zones, ecological corridors, and restoration areas in the section of the Shamakhi district of the Shahdagh National Park (Azerbaijan). Materials and methods. As materials, we used vector and raster data, as well as literature materials to determine and analyse the elements of an ecological network. Operations were performed by using ArcGIS 10.8 and ERDAS Imagine software. During the field research, observations were made in order to match the elements of the ecological network with the cameral study. Results. In the article, protected natural areas are presented as the core areas and the surrounding areas as buffer zones under the relevant legislation. Riverbeds, mountain passes, trails, and forests which should be planted in the areas we offer, were considered as main factors during the construction of ecological corridors in the national park and the buffer zones. In this case, “least-cost” modelling was applied and ecological corridors were designated to ensure connectivity between core areas. As a result, the optimal ecological network model for the study area has been developed and mapped in the article. Conclusion. The high growth rate of consumption of natural resources led to the loss of biodiversity in the last decades. At present, it is important to take the necessary measures, and connectivity of ecosystems and natural complexes play an important role in sustainability. The presented model in the study can help to conserve biodiversity, reduce anthropogenic impacts, eliminate environmental barriers, and develop appropriate forms of land use.
Downloads
References
2. Bennett A.F. Linkages in the landscape. The role of corridors and connectivity in wildlife conservation. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, 1999, UK. x+254 pp.
3. Bennett G. and Mulongoy K.J. Review of Experience with Ecological Networks, Corridors and Buffer Zones. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Technical Series, 2006, no. 23, 100 p.
4. Bennett G. and Wit P. The Development and Application of Ecological Networks: a Review of Proposals, Plans and Programmes. Amsterdam: AIDEnvironment, 2001. 137 p.
5. Bennett G. Integrating Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Use: Lessons Learned From Ecological Networks. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, 2004, UK. vi + 55 pp.
6. Carlson T.N. and Ripley D.A. On the Relation between NDVI, Fractional Vegetation Cover, and Leaf Area Index. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1997, 62 (3): pp. 241-252. DOI
7. Chang S.C., Tu C.J. & Chen H.Y. Ecological corridor in the urban area: case study in Kaohsiung City, Taiwan. Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management, 2010, 14 (1), pp. 76-88. DOI
8. Chen C.D., Meurk D.C., Ignatieva E.M., Stewart H.G. & Wu S.J. Identifying and evaluating functional connectivity for building urban ecological networks. Acta EcologicaSinica, 2015, 35 (19), pp. 18-35. DOI
9. Climenco V, Trombitki I., Andreev A. The Ecological Network: A way to the nature conservation in Moldova. BIOTICA-Ecological Society, Moldova, 2002.
10. Dataset: JAXA/METI ALOS PALSAR L1.0 (2007). Accessed through NASA's Alaska Satellite Facility Distributed Active Archive Center (accessed: Aug 05, 2020).
11. Drusch M., Del Bello U., Carlier S., Colin O., Fernandez V, Gascon F., ... & Bargellini P. Sentinel-2: ESA's optical high-resolution mission for GMES operational services. Remote sensing of Environment, 2012, 120, pp. 25-36. DOI
12. Gurrutxaga M, Lozano P.J., del Barrio G. GIS- based approach for incorporating the connectivity of ecological networks into regional planning. Journal for Nature Conservation, 2010, 18 (4): pp. 318-326. DOI
14. Hajiyev G.A., Rahimov VA. Climate characteristics of administrative regions of the Azerbaijan SSR. Baku, 1977. 270 p. (In Az.).
15. Ibrahimov T. National parks of Azerbaijan. Baku, 2015. 336 p. (In Az.).
16. Jongman R.H.G., Kulvik M., & Kristiansen I. European ecological networks and greenways. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2004, 68 (2-3), pp. 305-319. DOI
17. Lee T.M., Jetz W. Future battlegrounds for conservation under global change. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275 (1640), pp. 1261-1270. DOI
18. MacArthur R.H. and Wilson E.O. The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton University Press, 1967, vol.1. 215 p.
19. Mammadov G.Sh., Khalilov M.Y. Forests of Azerbaijan. 2002, Baku, 472 p. (In Az.)
20. Martino D. Buffer Zones around Protected Areas: A Brief Literature Review. Electron. Green Journal, 2001, 1 (15), pp. 1-20.
21. Opdam P., Steingrover E.G., & van Rooij S.A.M. Ecological networks: A spatial concept for multi-actor planning of sustainable landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2006, 75 (3-4), pp. 322-332. DOI
22. Pressey R.L., Cabeza M., Watts M.E., Cowling R.M., Wilson K.A. Conservation planning in a changing world. Trends in ecology & evolution, 2007, 22 (11), pp. 583-592. DOI
23. Rodoman B.B. Landscape Polarization as a Means of Biosphere and Recreational Resources Conservation. Resources, Environment, Settlement, 1974, Nauka, pp. 150-162. (In Russ.).
24. Simenova V, Bos E., Jongman R., Zingstra H. Implementation of ecological networks in different socio-economic contexts. Guiding principles based on experiences in Central and Eastern Europe. Wageningen, Alterra, 2009. 117 p.
