The influence of the structure of carbon nanotubes in the polymer matrix on interfacial effects in nanocomposites
Abstract
It is now a well-known fact that interfacial effects play a decisive role in the formation of the properties of polymer composites on the whole and nanocomposites in particular. Therefore, this article investigates the relations between the structure of carbon nanotubes in the polymer matrix of a nanocomposite and the level of interfacial adhesion which is characterisedby dimensionless parameter ba.
It was shown that carbon nanotubes form ring-like structures, which are analogous to macromolecular coils of branched polymer chains and represent a specific type of aggregates for nanofillers of this type. Such ring-like structures can be geometrically described either by a full circle (“closed” structures) or by a part of it (arc) (“open” structures). The amplification of the aggregation process of carbon nanotubes characterised by a decrease in the radius of the ring-like structures is accompanied by a decrease in the fractal dimension of their surface compared to the nominal maximum value. When the ring-like structures reach the smallest possible (about 130 nm) radius, their surface is perceived by the polymer matrix as absolutely smooth, i.e. with a dimension of d=2. This determines the transition of the level of interfacial adhesion from
nanoadhesion to perfect adhesion by Kerner. The nanoadhesion effect allows significantly improving the properties of polymer/carbon nanotube nanocomposites. The nanoadhesion effect only takes place if the surface of the ring-like structures of nanotubes is fractal.
Parameter ba, which characterises the level of interfacial adhesion in polymer nanocomposites, linearly increases with an increase in the fractal dimension of the surface of carbon nanotube aggregates. In this case, the highest attainable nominal dimension of the nanotubes surface, equal to ~ 2.85, is only achieved for “open” ring-like structures. The proposed analytical methods make it possible to predict both interfacial characteristics and the properties of polymer/carbon nanotube nanocomposites.
Downloads
References
Moniruzzaman M., Winey K. I. Polymer nanocomposites containing carbon nanotubes. Macromolecules. 2006;39(16): 5194–5205. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma060733p
Coleman J. N., Khan U., Blau W. J., Gun’ko Y. K. Small but strong: A review of the mechanical properties of carbon nanotube-polymer composites. Carbon. 2006;44(6): 1624–1652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2006.02.038
Coleman J. N., Cadek M., Ryan K. P., Fonseca A., Nady J. B., Blau W. J., Ferreira M. S. Reinforcement of polymers with carbon nanotubes. The role of an ordered polymer interfacial regions. Experiment and modeling. Polymer. 2006;47(23): 8556–8561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2006.10.014
Yang K., Gu M., Guo Y., Pan X., Mu G. Effect of carbon nanotube functionalization on the mechanical and thermal properties of epoxy composites. Carbon. 2009;47(7): 1723–1737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2009.02.029
Supova M., Martynkova G. S., Barabashova K. Effect of nanofiller dispersion in polymer matrices: a review. Science of Advanced Materials. 2011;3(1): 1–25.https://doi.org/10.1166/sam.2011.1136
Mikitaev A. K., Kozlov G. V., Zaikov G. E. Polymer Nanocomposites: Variety of Structural Forms and Applications. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 2008; 319 p.
Kim H., Abdala A. A., Macosko C. W. Graphene/polymernanocomsites. Macromolecules. 2010;43(16): 6515–530. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma100572e
Schaefer D. W., Justice R. S. How nano are nanocomposites? Macromolecules. 2007;40(24): 8501–8517. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma070356w
Atlukhanova L. B., Dolbin I. V., Kozlov G. V. The physical characteristics of nanofiller and interfacial regions in nanocomposites with polymer/carbon nanotubes and elastomeric vitreous matrix. Condenced Matter and Interphases. 2019;21(4): 471–477. https://doi.org/10.17308/kcmf.2019.21/2358
Bridge B. Theoretical modeling of the critical volume fraction for percolation conductivity in fibreloaded conductive polymer composites. Journal of Materials Science Letters. 1989;8(2): 102–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00720265
Schaefer D. W., Zhao J., Dowty H., Alexander M., Orler E. B. Carbon nanofibre reinforcement of soft materials. Soft Matter. 2008;4(10): 2071–2078. https://doi.org/10.1039/b805314f
Kozlov G. V., Dolbin I. V. Theoretical basis for designing high-modulus polymer fibers and nanocomposites based on them. Fibre Chemistry. 2021;53(1): 46–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10692-021-10237-7
Omidi M., Rokni D. T., Milani A. S., Seethaler R. J., Arasteh R. Prediction of the mechanical characteristics of multi-walled carbon nanotube/epoxy composites using a new form of the rule of mixtures. Carbon. 2010;48(11): 3218–3228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2010.05.007
Kozlov G. V., Magomedov G. M., Magomedov G. M., Dolbin I. V. The structure of carbon nanotubes in a polymer matrix. Condenced Matter and Interphases. 2021;23(2): 223–228. https://doi.org/10.17308/kcmf.2021.23/3433
Thostenson E. T., Chou T.-W. Processingstructure-multi-functional properties relationship in carbon nanotube/epoxy composites. Carbon. 2006;44(12): 3022–3029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2006.05.014
Kozlov G. V., Dolbin I. V. Effect of the surface structure of a 2D Nanofiller on the elastic modulus of polymer nanocomposites. Journal of Surface Investigation: X-ray, Synchrotron and Neutron Techniques. 2019;13(4): 766–770. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1027451019040268
Kozlov G. V., Dolbin I. V. Interrelation between elastic moduli of filler and polymethyl methacrylatecarbon nanotube nanocomposites. Glass Physics and Chemistry. 2019;45(4): 277–280. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1087659619040060
Copyright (c) 2022 Condensed Matter and Interphases
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
