Influence of structural changes on current-voltage characteristics of the anion exchange membrane after their long contact with an ampholyte solution

  • Ekaterina D. Belashova Cand. Sci. (Chem.), Engineer of Research Institute of Membranes, Kuban State University, Krasnodar. E-mail: ekaterinabelashova23@gmail.com
  • Evgeniya A. Minakova Master, Physical Chemistry Department, Kuban State University, Krasnodar. E-mail: evgeniya.shutkina@gmail.com
  • Olesia A. Kharchenko Bachelor, Physical Chemistry Department, Kuban State University, Krasnodar. E-mail: olesia93rus@mail.com
  • Natalia D. Pismenskaya Dr. Sci. (Chem.), Professor, Physical Chemistry Department, Kuban State University, Krasnodar. E-mail: n_pismen@mail.ru
Keywords: anion-exchange membrane, ampholytes, current-voltage characteristics, diffusion permeability, selectivity

Abstract

This work aims to study the evolution of the transport properties and electrochemical characteristics of the anion exchange membrane Ralex AMH-PES (Mega, Czech Republic) after prolonged contact with a solution of sodium dihydrogen phosphate. The investigated membrane was divided into two pieces, one of which was balanced with a solution of NaH2PO4 (0.02 mol/dm3) and exposed there for 336 hours, while the other sample was kept in the NaCl solution (0.02 mol/dm3). The transport and current-voltage characteristics of both samples were studied in NaCl solution.
The membrane electrical conductivity was measured by the differential method using a clip-type cell. The values of the inter-gel volume fractions were found by the tilt angles of the conductivity concentration dependences, constructed in the bilogarithmic coordinates. The membrane thickness was controlled by the precision digital micrometer. The membrane diffusion permeability was measured in a two-chamber flow cell. Current-voltage characteristics of the samples were obtained in the four-chamber flow cell.
The results showed that two weeks exposure of the anion exchange membrane in the sodium dihydrogen phosphate solution led to an increase of its thickness and diffusion permeability compared to the sample located in the NaCl solution. At the same time, it did not cause significant changes in the values of conductivity and effective transport numbers of co- and counter-ions. However, the length of the plateau on the current-voltage characteristic of the membrane decreased, and the value of limiting current increased by 9%. The detected changes in transport and electrochemical characteristics of the investigated anion exchange membrane apparently caused by a substantial swelling of the ion exchange material in the presence of strongly hydrated anions of phosphoric acid. The later led to the amplification of osmotic and electroosmotic transport of water through the central part of the membrane pores and to the development of equilibrium electroconvection

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.Sanders J.P.M., Clark J.H., Harmsen G.J., Heeres H.J. et al., Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 2012, Vol. 51, pp. 117-136.
2.Kattan Readi O.M., Gironès M., Wiratha W., Nijmeijer K., Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, Vol. 52, pp. 10691078.
3.Ramirez P., Alcaraz A., Mafe S., Pellicer J., Journal of Membrane Science, 1999, Vol. 161, pp. 143-155.
4.Kattan Readi O.M., Rolevink E., Nijmeijer K., Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 2014, Vol. 89, pp. 425-435.
5.Sarapulova V., Nevakshenova E., Pismenskaya N., Dammak L. et al., Journal of Membrane Science, 2015, Vol. 479, pp. 28-38.
6.Nevakshenova Е.Е., Korzhova Е.С., Pismenskaya N.D., Sorbtsionnye i khromatograficheskie protsessy, 2012, Vol. 12, No 6, pp. 893-900.
7.Shutkina E.A., Nevakshenova E.E., Pismenskaya N.D., Mareev S.A. et al., Condensed matter and interphases, 2015, Vol. 17, No 4, pp. 566-578.
8.Ghalloussi R., Garcia-Vasquez W., Chaabane L., Dammak L. et al., Journal of Membrane Science, 2013, Vol. 436, pp. 68-78.
9.Garcia-Vasquez W., Dammak L., Larchet C., Nikonenko V.V. et al., Journal of Membrane Science, 2013, Vol. 446, pp. 255256.
10.Ečer J., Kinčl J., Čurda L., Desalination and Water Treatment, 2015, Vol. 56, pp. 32733277.
11.Zabolotskiiz V.I., Bugakov V.V., Sharafan M.V., Chermit R.Kh., Russian Journal of Electrochemistry, 2012, Vol. 48, No 6, pp. 650-659.
12.GOST 17553-72. Membrany ionoobmennye. Metody podgotovki k ispytanijum. M., Izdatel'stvo standartov, 1972, 4 p.
13.Lteif R., Dammak L., Larchet C., Auclair B., European Polymer Journal, 1999, Vol. 35, pp. 1187-1195.
14.Karpenko L.V., Demina O.A., Dvorkina G.A., Parshikov S.B. et al., Russian Journal of Electrochemistry, 2001, Vol. 37, pp. 287-293.
15.Zabolotsky V.I., Nikonenko V.V., Journal of Membrane Science, 1993, Vol. 79, pp. 181198.
16.Larchet C., Auclair B., Nikonenko V., Electrochimica Acta., 2004, Vol. 49, pp. 17111717.
17.Gnusin N.P., Berezina N.P., Shudrenko А.А., Ivina O.P., Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1994, Vol. 68, No 3, pp. 565.
18. Belashova E.D., Melnik N.A., Pismenskaya N.D., Shevtsova K.A., et al., Acta, 2012, Vol. 59, pp. 412-423.
19.Pismenskaya N.D., Nikonenko V.V., Belova E.I., Lopatkova G.Yu. et al., Russian Journal of Electrochemistry, 2007, Vol. 43, No 3, pp. 307-327.
20.Rösler H.-W., Maletzki F., Staude E., Journal of Membrane Science, 1992, Vol. 72, pp. 171-179.
21.Nikonenko V.V., Pismenskaya N.D., Belova E.I., Sistat Ph. et al., Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2010, Vol. 160, pp. 101123.
22.Koga Y., Kondo T., Miyazaki Y., Inaba A., Journal of Solution Chemistry, 2012, Vol. 41, pp. 1388-1400.
23.Koga Y. Ultrasonic velocity and absorption studies in aqueous electrolytes; in: Solution Thermodynamics and Its Application to Aqueous Solutions: A Differential Approach, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 2007, Vol. 5, 310 p.
24.Koter S., Kultys M., Separation and Purification Technology, 2010, Vol. 73, pp. 219229.
25.Mason P.E., Cruickshank J.M., Neilson G.W., Buchanan P., Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2003, Vol. 5, pp. 4686-4690.
26.Helfferich F. Ion Exchange, New York, McGraw-Hill, 1962, 624 p.
27.Berezina N., Gnusinn N., Dyomina O., Timofeyev S., Journal of Membrane Science, 1994, Vol. 86, pp. 207-229.
28.Kniaginicheva E.V., Belashova E.D., Sarapulova V.V., Pismenskaya N.D., Condensed matter and interphases, 2014, Vol. 16, No 3, pp. 282-287.
29.Korzhova E., Pismenskaya N., Lopatin D., Baranov O. et al., Journal of Membrane Science, 2016, Vol. 500, pp. 161-170.
30.Mishchuk N.A., Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2010, Vol. 160, pp. 16-39. 31.Rubinstein I., Zaltzman B., Physical Review Letters, 2015, Vol. 114, No 114502, pp. 15.
32.Rubinstein I., Zaltzman B., Physical review E., 2000, Vol. 62, pp. 2238-2251.
33.Vasil’eva V.I., Zhiltsova A.V., Akberova E.M., Fataeva A.I., Condensed matter and interphases, 2014, Vol. 16, No 3, pp. 257-261.
34.Akberova E.M., Vasil’eva V.I., Malykhin M.D., Condensed matter and interphases, 2015, Vol. 17, No 3, pp. 273-280.
Published
2019-11-18
How to Cite
Belashova, E. D., Minakova, E. A., Kharchenko, O. A., & Pismenskaya, N. D. (2019). Influence of structural changes on current-voltage characteristics of the anion exchange membrane after their long contact with an ampholyte solution. Sorbtsionnye I Khromatograficheskie Protsessy, 16(5). Retrieved from https://journals.vsu.ru/sorpchrom/article/view/1395