Classification of tools for reducing corruption risks in the system of public procurement, depending on their impact on the factors of corruption R. Klitgaard
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17308/econ.2022.4/10598Keywords:
corruption, counteraction, public procurement, economic approach, economic securityAbstract
Importance. The development of tools to reduce corruption risks in the procurement system to ensure public needs (public procurement) is an important state task. The current state of public procurement indicates the presence in this area: firstly, contradictions between the anticorruption target of creating a modern public procurement system and the reality of largescale corruption in this system; secondly, the variety of forms and manifestations of corruption in the public procurement system that require study, systematization for the purposes of effectively countering this negative phenomenon. Scientific thought has formed a rich theoretical and methodological basis for combating corruption, the important elements of which are the economic formula of corruption by R. Klitgaard and the formula of the expected benefit of the criminal G. Becker. We believe that taking into account the factors underlying these formulas is an important condition for developing an effective anticorruption policy in the public procurement system based on the laws of the economy.
Objectives. Classification of tools for reducing corruption risks in the public procurement system depending on their impact on corruption factors by R. Klitgaard.
Methodology. In the process of achieving the set goals, the methods of scientific cognition were used: retrospective analysis of normative regulation; structural analysis, formal logical analysis, method of scientific classification. The research is based on the study of current scientific and periodical economic literature.
Conclusions and Relevance. As a result, the article highlights anticorruption measures of regulation of public procurement aimed at: reducing the monopoly position of an official; reducing arbitrariness in choosing decisions; increasing responsibility through punishment provided for by legislation; increasing responsibility through the detection of corrupt transactions and the application of punishment
Downloads
References
Golovin, S. V., Lutsenko, M. S., Shendrikova, O.O. (2020) On the is-sue of control of procurement of goods, works and services of organizations of the commercial and public sector of the economy Proceedings of Voronezh State Uni-versity. Series: Economics and Management. 4. DOI: 10.17308/econ.2020.4/3189 (In Russian)
Gorokhova, D. V. (2020) Public procurement in the Russian Federa-tion: a retrospective and development. Financial Journal. №2. DOI: 10.31107/2075-1990-2020-2-57-68 (In Russian)
Dronov, R. V., Kirilenko, B. P. (2012) [Corruption and the State. The Economic "Black hole"]. Polytechnic Publishing House, St. Petersburg DOI: 10.18720/SPBPU/2/si20-252 (In Russian)
Karasev, A. K. (2017) Organizational and legal mechanism of public procurement in European countries. Penal enforcement law. №4.
Katrich, A.D. (2019) The history of the development of state and mu-nicipal procurement. International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences. 5-2. DOI: 10.24411/2500-1000-2019-10934 (In Russian)
Levin, M. I., Satarov, G.A. (2012) Corruption in Russia: measurement and classification // Economic issues. -. No. 10. P. 4-30. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2012-10-4-29 (In Russian)
Mubarakshina, E. R. (2018) Foreign experience in the organization of public procurement. Bulletin of Science and Education. 16-1 (52) (In Russian)
Starodubova, V. S. (2019) Comparative analysis of the organization of public procurement in the Russian Federation and the USA. International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences. No.5-3. DOI: 10.24411/2500-1000-2019-10997 (In Russian)
Shmeleva, M.V. (2018) Prevention of corruption and other abuses in the field of public procurement. Russian law: education, practice, science. 1 (103) (In Russian)
Yukhachev, S. P., Yuriev, V. M. (2008) Corruption as a threat to the national security of the Russian Federation. Socio-economic phenomena and pro-cesses. 4, 101—104. (In Russian)
Becker G.S. (1995) The economics of crime. Cross Sections. 8 - 15.
Gnoffo, S. A. (2021) Dynamic performance management approach to frame corruption in public procurement: a case study. Journal of Public Procure-ment. 21, 1. P. 75-96.
Heidenheimer, A. J. (1970) Political Corruption: Readings in Com-parative Analysis. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Huntington S.
Khoso, A. R., Md Yusof, A., Chai C., Laghari M. A. ( 2021) Robust contractor eval-uation criteria classification for modern technology public con-struction pro-jects. Journal of Public Procurement. Vol. 21. 1. P. 53-74.
Klitgaard, R. (1988) Controlling Corruption. By Robert Klitgaard. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kosinski, E. (2017) Legal guarantees of economic competition in the regulation of public procurement of the European Union. Bulletin of VUiT. 4. (In Russian)
