Реакция на засуху различных линий армянской кукурузы в зависимости от почвенно-климатических условий

  • Астгик Рафиковна Сукиасян National Polytechnic University of Armenia
  • Арташес Ваганович Тадевосян National Polytechnic University of Armenia
  • Геворг Петросович Пирумян Erevan State University
Keywords: maize, drought, water potential, osmotic pressure, soil and climatic conditions

Abstract

The article describes the reaction to the drought by the kinematic profiles of four lines of maize with contrast sensitivity to the stress-factor depending on the soil and climatic conditions together with the control inbred line B73. It was noted that drought resistance strongly reduced leaf growth parameters, including the rate of elongation and the final length of the fifth leaf. It was determined that the phenotypic differences between lines differing in geographic origin (Armenian samples and B73) and tolerance to drought can be identified in the seedling stage by measuring the total length, osmotic pressure values and the water potential of the fifth maize leaf.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Астгик Рафиковна Сукиасян, National Polytechnic University of Armenia

Candidate of Biological Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Environmental Engineering and Biotechnology, National Polytechnic University of Armenia, Erevan

Арташес Ваганович Тадевосян, National Polytechnic University of Armenia

Candidate of Technical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Environmental Engineering and Biotechnology, National Polytechnic University of Armenia, Erevan

Геворг Петросович Пирумян, Erevan State University

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor of the Centre for Ecological Safety, Erevan State University, Erevan

References

1.Vliyanie abioticheskogo stressa na rost rastenij / А.R. Sukiasyan [i dr.] // Uspekhi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya. – 2016. – No 7. – S. 168-172.
2.Kirakosyan А. А. Ispol'zovanie yazyka MATLAB vkachestve ehkspress-metoda otsenki ehksperimental'nykhrezul'tatov / А. А. Kirakosyan, А. R. Sukiasyan // Informat-sionnye tekhnologii : Mezhdunarodnaya molodezhnaya konferentsiya, 23-25 iyunya 2005 g. – Erevan, 2005. – S. 34-37.
3.Boyer J. S. Plant productivity and environment /J. S. Boyer. // Science. – 1982. – Vol. 218. – P. 443-448.
4.Genetic Properties of the Maize Nested Association Mapping Population / Michael D. McMullen [et al.] // Sci-ence. – 2009. – Vol. 325, No 737. – P. 737-740.
5.Cruz de Carvalho M. H. Drought stress and reactiveoxygen species. Production, scavenging and signaling / Cruzde Carvalho M. H. // Plant Signal Behav. – 2008. – Vol. 3,No 3. – P. 156-165.
6.Heat stress causes alterations in the cell-wall polymers and anatomy of coffee leaves (Coffea arabica L.) /R. B. Lima [et al.] // Carbohydrate Polymers. – 2013. –Vol. 93. – P. 135-143.
7.Hyacinthe Le Gall Cell Wall Metabolism in Responseto Abiotic Stress / Hyacinthe Le Gall [et al.] // Plants. –2015. – Vol. 4. – P. 112-166.
8.Identification of cell wall genes modified by a permissive high temperature in Chinese cabbage / K. A. Yang[et al.] // Plant Sci. – 2006. – Vol. 171. – P. 175-182.
9.IPCC, 2014 : Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to theFifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel onClimate Change / ed. R. K. Pachauri, L. A. Meyer. – Geneva, Switzerland, 2014. – 151 p.
10.Lobell D. B. Climate trends and global crop production since 1980 / D. B Lobell, W. Schlenker, J. Costa-Roberts // Science. – 2011. – Vol. 333, No 6042. – P. 616-620.
11.Ranking the World's Most Water-Stressed Countries in 2040 / A. Maddocks [et al.]. – 2015. – August 26. – URL: http://www.wri.org/blog/2015/08/ranking-world%E2%80%99s-most-water-stressed-countries-2040
12.Responses to abiotic stresses / Bray E. A. [et al.] //W. Gruissem Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants/ W. Gruissem, B. Buchannan, R. Jones; American Societyof Plant Physiologists. – Rockville, MD, 2000. – P. 1158-1249.
13.Temperature responses of roots: impact on growth,root system architecture and implications for phenotyping /K. A. Nagel [et al.] // Functional Plant Biology. – 2009. –Vol. 36. – P. 947-959.
14.Tollenaar M. Yield potential, yield stability andstress tolerance in maize / M. Tollenaar, E. A. Lee // FieldCrops Research. – 2002. – Vol. 75. – P. 161-169.
15.Transgenic Tobacco Plants Overexpressing a GrassPpEXP1 Gene Exhibit Enhanced Tolerance to Heat Stress/ Q. Xu [et al.] // PLoS One. – 2014. – Vol. 9. – e100792.
Published
2018-04-17
How to Cite
Сукиасян, А. Р., Тадевосян, А. В., & Пирумян, Г. П. (2018). Реакция на засуху различных линий армянской кукурузы в зависимости от почвенно-климатических условий. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Geography. Geoecology, (2), 96-102. https://doi.org/10.17308/geo.2018.2/2218
Section
Geoecology