Red onion anthocyanins: a source of cyanidin-3-laminaribioside unique to plants

Authors

  • Anastasiya S. Biryukova Belgorod State University, Belgorod
  • Irina P. Blinova Belgorod State University, Belgorod, Russian Federation
  • Victor I. Deineka Belgorod State University, Belgorod, Russian Federation
  • Lyudmila A. Deineka Belgorod State University, Belgorod

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17308/sorpchrom.2025.25/13573

Keywords:

reversed-phase HPLC, hydrophilic HPLC, cyanidin-3-diglucosides, sophoroside, laminiribioside, retention, electronic absorption spectra

Abstract

The work analyzes anthocyanins of red onion, which contain a unique 3-glycoside of cyanidin–laminaribioside (Cy3Lami), synthesized in the plant from cyanidin-3-glucoside (Cy3Glu) by adding another glucose molecule at position 3. This anthocyanin is an isomer of the more commonly found naturally occurring cyanidin-3-sophoroside (Cy3Sopho), in which the second glucose molecule is attached at position 2. It was found that the retention of both isomers under reversed-phase HPLC conditions differs significantly: if Cy3Sopho is retained less strongly than Cy3Glu, then the retention times of Cy3Lami are close to the retention of Cy3Rut, and it is necessary to select the composition of the mobile phase to separate these components. It should be noted that the electronic absorption spectra of Cy3Glu, Cy3Sopho, and Cy3Lami are practically indistinguishable, but are distinguishable from the spectrum of Cy3Rut, which has a small bathochromic shift of the main absorption band by 1 nm. The only feature common to all three diglycosides was the slope of the trend lines on the separation maps, which is characteristic of all diglycosides under reversed-phase HPLC conditions. In addition to the two main glycosides (Cy3Glu and Cy3Lami), the chromatograms also revealed two products of their acylation with malonic acid, hydrolyzed quite quickly under the conditions of storage of anthocyanins in acidic solutions. Previously, when separating anthocyanins under hydrophilic chromatography conditions, it was found that both hexosides (glucoside and galactoside) have the same retention times, as do both pentosides (arabinoside and xyloside), which differ in lower retention compared to hexosides. This is typical for the distribution mechanism of anthocyanin retention in the water-enriched layer generated in situ on the surface of the sorbent. However, two cyanidin diglucosides (Cy3Sopho and Cy3Lami) showed different retention times when separated by hydrophilic interaction chromatography on a Kromasil 60-5DIOL stationary phase. The hope that the third possible (according to literary data) isomeric cyanidin diglucoside is contained in red rye seedlings was not justified: the diglycoside from the extract of this plant did not differ from Cy3Rut either in chromatographic behavior or in electronic absorption spectra.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Anastasiya S. Biryukova, Belgorod State University, Belgorod

    Postgraduate of Institute of Pharmacy, Chemistry and Biology of Belgorod State University, Belgorod, Russian Federation

  • Irina P. Blinova, Belgorod State University, Belgorod, Russian Federation

    Associate Professor of General Chemistry Department of Institute of Pharmacy, Chemistry and Biology of Belgorod State University, Belgorod, Russian Federation

  • Victor I. Deineka, Belgorod State University, Belgorod, Russian Federation

    Professor of General Chemistry Department of Institute of Pharmacy, Chemistry and Biology of Belgorod State University, Belgorod, Russian Federation

  • Lyudmila A. Deineka, Belgorod State University, Belgorod

    Associate Professor of General Chemistry Department of Institute of Pharmacy, Chemistry and Biology of Belgorod State University, Belgorod, Russian Federation

References

Cabrita L., Petrov V., Pina F. RSC Adv. 2014; 35: 18939. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RA47809B

Andersen Ø.M., Jordheim M., Bya-mukama R., Mbabazi A., Ogweng G., Skaar I., Kiremire B. Phytochem. 2010; 71: 1558-1563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2010.05.025

Hanamura T., Hagiwara T., Kawagishi H. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2005; 62: 280-286. doi.org/10.1271/bbb.69.280

Deineka V.I., Kulchenko Ya.Yo., Kieu Ngo Thi Diem, Kurkina Y.N., Deineka L.A. Internat. J. Pharm. Technol. 2016; 8: 14088-14096.

Deineka V.I., Deineka L.A., Sorokopu-dov V.N., Dubovceva I.S., Majorova E.B. Nauchnye vedomosti BelGU. Ser. Estestvennye nauki. 2012; 21(140), 21/1: 149-153. (In Russ.)

Kostenko M.O., Deineka V.I., Deineka L.A. Chemical Technologies 2016; 11: 58-63. (In Russ.)

Deineka V.I., Oleinits E.Yu., Pavlov A.A., Mikheev A.Yu., Shelepova O.V., Volkova O.D., Khlebnikova E.I. Khimiya Ras-titel'nogo Syr'ya. 2020; 1: 81-88. https://doi.org/10.14258/jcprm.2020016331

Deineka V.I., Chulkov A.N., Deineka L.A., Gandarmova P.A., Sorokopudov V.N., Rybitskyi S.М. Sorbtsionnye i khromato-graficheskie protsessy. 2014; 14: 434-442. (In Russ.)

Jordheim M., Giske N.H., Andersen Ø.M. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2007; 35: 153-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2006.09.010

Timberlake C.F., Bridle P. Rosaceae. Phytochem. 1971; 10: 2265-2267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(00)97244-3

Chulkov A.N., Dejneka V.I., Naval'ne-va I.A., Dejneka L.A., Sorokopudov V.N. Nauchnye vedomosti BelGU. Ser. Estestvennye nauki. 2011; 9 (104) 15/1: 382-388. (In Russ.)

Hanci F. J. Agric. Veter. Sci. 2018; 11: 17-27. https://doi.org/10.9790/2380-1109011727

González-de-Peredo A.V., Vázquez-Espinosa M., Ferreiro-González M., Carrera C., Espada-Bellido E., Barbero G.F. Palma M. Antioxidants. 2022; 11: 846. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11050846

Deineka V.I., Deineka L.A., Saenko I.I., Chulkov A.N. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2015; 89: 1300-1304. doi.org/10.1134/S0036024415070079

Deineka V., Grigor’ev А.М. J. Anal. Chem. 20004; 59: 270-274. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JANC.0000018972.54587.ce

Fossen T., Andersen Ø.M. Phytochem. 2003; 62: 1217-1220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(02)00746-X

Deineka V.I., Sidorov A.N., Deineka L.A. J. Anal. Chem. 2016; 71: 1145-1150. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061934816110034

Busch E., Strack D., Weissenböck G. Z. Naturforsch. 1986; 41c: 485-486. https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-1986-0417

Deineka V.I., Saenko I.I., Deineka L.A., Blinova I.P. J. Anal. Chem. 2016; 71: 297-301. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061934816030035

Downloads

Published

2026-02-10

How to Cite

Red onion anthocyanins: a source of cyanidin-3-laminaribioside unique to plants. (2026). Sorbtsionnye I Khromatograficheskie Protsessy, 25(6), 894-900. https://doi.org/10.17308/sorpchrom.2025.25/13573

Most read articles by the same author(s)