Term structure of risk factor premiums: evidence from international equity markets

Keywords: Markov mode switching, factor structure of risk premium, risk-adjusted premium

Abstract

Subject. Factor models are among the most popular tools for the analysis of stock market risks. For a long time, factor models were developed mainly by the formation of additional risk factors. However, static linear specifications are usually not sufficiently sensitive to structural changes in the market and to changes in the operational regimes of markets and in this regard they have a limited number of functions. The idea of regime switching is natural for markets and is intuitively comprehensible, therefore, in order to take into account the non-linear dependencies in factor models of risk analysis, it is advisable to use the mechanism of Markov regime switching with them.
Objectives. Statistical analysis of the dynamic properties of the factor structure of risk premiums for transactions with stock market financial instruments based on a modification of the Fama & MacBeth procedure that takes into account the current market regime.
Methods: In our study, we used parametric methods of data analysis and machine learning methods, description, analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, comparison, and grouping method. An EM algorithm was used for the parametric identification of models with Markov regime switching.
Results: The paper provides convincing evidence that the relationship between the excess return of financial instruments and factor loads is influenced by the current regime in the market. The main feature of the low volatility regime is the presence of a positive statistically significant risk-adjusted premium. The change in the current regime in the market is accompanied by the transformation of the factor structure of the risk premium. This fact indicates that it is reasonable to divide risk factors into speculative and protective risk factors. Speculative factors include market risks, the risk related to the size of the issuing company, and the momentum effect risk. They have a positive and significant premium in the low volatility regime. The protective factors include risk factors related to value, capital investment, and return on equity. The protective factors are characterised by a positive and significant premium only during periods of high volatility.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Viacheslav V. Korotkikh, Voronezh State University

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Assoc. Prof., IT and Mathematical Methods in Economics Department

References

Abdymomunov, A., & Morley, J. (2011). Time variation of CAPM betas across market volatility regimes. Applied Financial Economics, 21(19), 1463–1478. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603107.2011.577010

Ahmad, W., Bhanumurthy, N. R., & Sehgal, S. (2015). Regime dependent dynamics and European stock markets: Is asset allocation really possible? Empirica, 42(1), 77–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-014-9248-0

Ang, A., Liu, J., & Schwarz, K. (2020). Using Stocks or Portfolios in Tests of FactorA Models. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 55(3), 709–750. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109019000255

Arshanapalli, B., Fabozzi, F. J., & Nelson, W. (2006). The value, size, and momentum spread during distressed economic periods. Finance Research Letters, 3(4), 244–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2006.05.001

Asness, C. S., Moskowitz, T. J., & Pedersen, L. H. (2013). Value and Momentum Everywhere. Journal of Finance, 68(3), 929–985. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12021

Bialkowski, J. (2004). Modelling Returns on Stock Indices for Western and Central European Stock Exchanges - a Markov Switching Approach. South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics, 2(2), 81–100.

Carhart, M. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x

Charles, A., Darné, O., & Moussa, Z. (2014). The sensitivity of Fama-French factors to economic uncertainty. Working Paper.

Chen, J., & Kawaguchi, Y. (2018). Multi-Factor Asset-Pricing Models under Markov Regime Switches: Evidence from the Chinese Stock Market. International Journal of Financial Studies, 6(2), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs6020054

Chordia, T., Goyal, A., & Shanken, J. A. (2015). Cross-Sectional Asset Pricing with Individual Stocks: Betas versus Characteristics. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2549578

Coggi, P., & Manescu, B. (2011). A Multifactor Model of Stock Returns with Endogenous Regime Switching. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.553781

Cotter, J., & Salvador, E. (2014). The Non-Linear Trade-Off between Return and Risk: A Regime-Switching Multi-Factor Framework. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2513282

Dirkx, P., & Peter, F. J. (2020). The Fama-French Five-Factor Model Plus Momentum: Evidence for the German Market. Schmalenbach Business Review, 72(4), 661–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41464-020-00105-y

Endovitsky, D. A., Davnis, V. V., & Korotkikh, V. V. (2018). Adaptive trend decomposition method in financial time series analysis. Journal of Social Sciences Research, 2018(Special Issue 3), 104–109. https://doi.org/10.32861/jssr.spi3.104.109

Endovitsky, D. A., Korobeinikova, L. S., & Korotkikh, V. V. (2021). Adaptive Portfolio Analysis based on the Trend Decomposition of a Financial Time Series: Case Study of the Moscow Exchange. Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance, 9(5), 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujaf.2021.090525

Endovitsky, D. А., & Korotkikh, V. V. (2022). Regime shifts in equity risk premium: international evidence. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Economics and Management, 1. https://doi.org/10.17308/econ.2022.1/3842

Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3–56.

Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2012). Size, value, and momentum in international stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 105(3), 457–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.05.011

Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2015). A five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of Financial Economics, 116(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.10.010

Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2018). Choosing factors. Journal of Financial Economics, 128(2), 234–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.02.012

Fama, E. F., & MacBeth, J. D. (1973). Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 607–636. https://doi.org/10.1086/260061

Fort, T. C., Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R. S., & Miranda, J. (2013). How firms respond to business cycles: The role of firm age and firm size. IMF Economic Review, 61(3), 520–559. https://doi.org/10.1057/imfer.2013.15

Garcis, R. (1998). Asymptotic Null Distribution of the Likelihood Ratio Test in Markov Switching Models. International Economic Review, 39(3), 763–788.

Gertler, M., & Gilchrist, S. (1994). Monetary policy, business cycles, and the behavior of small manufacturing firms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(2), 309–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118465

Griffin, J. M., Ji, X., & Martin, J. S. (2003). Momentum Investing and Business Cycle Risk: Evidence from Pole to Pole. Journal of Finance, 58(6), 2515–2547. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1540-6261.2003.00614.x

Guidolin, M., & Timmermann, A. (2007). Asset allocation under multivariate regime switching. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 31(11), 3503–3544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2006.12.004

Guidolin, M., & Timmermann, A. (2008). Size and value anomalies under regime shifts. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 6(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbm021

Hamilton, J. D. (1989). A New Approach to the Economic Analysis of Nonstationary Time Series and the Business Cycle. Econometrica, 57(2), 357. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912559

Hanauer, M. (2014). Is Japan different? Evidence on momentum and market dynamics. International Review of Finance, 14(1), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/irfi.12024

Hanauer, M., & Windmueller, S. (2019). Enhanced Momentum Strategies. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3437919

Jagannathan, R., & Wang, Z. (1996). The conditional CAPM and the cross-section of expected returns. Journal of Finance, 51(1), 3–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb05201.x

Jegadeesh, N., & Titman, S. (1993). Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency. The Journal of Finance, 48(1), 65–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04702.x

Lettau, M., & Ludvigson, S. (2001). Consumption, aggregate wealth, and expected stock returns. Journal of Finance, 56(3), 815–849. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00347

Liu, P. P., xu, K., & Zhao, Y. (2011). Market regimes, sectorial investments, and time-varying risk premiums. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 7(2), 107–133. https://doi.org/10.1108/17439131111122120

Petkova, R., & Zhang, L. (2005). Is value riskier than growth? Journal of Financial Economics, 78(1), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.12.001

Wang, J., Zhou, M. C., Guo, X., Qi, L., & Wang, X. (2021). A Markov regime switching model for asset pricing and ambiguity measurement of stock market. Neurocomputing, 435, 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2020.12.103

Теплова, Т. В. (2011). Тестирование конструкции CAPM с альтернативными мерами риска в объяснении различий в наблюдаемых доходностях акций российского рынка (часть 1). Управление Корпоративными Финансами, 2, 66–76.

Теплова, Т. В., & Шутова, Е. С. (2011). Тестирование конструкции CAPM с альтернативными мерами риска в объяснении различий в наблюдаемых доходностях акций российского рынка (часть 2). Управление Корпоративными Финансами, 3, 138–151.

Published
2022-06-30
How to Cite
Korotkikh, V. V. (2022). Term structure of risk factor premiums: evidence from international equity markets. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Economics and Management, (2), 83-98. https://doi.org/10.17308/econ.2022.2/8989
Section
Accounting, statistics

Most read articles by the same author(s)