Hydrothermal assisted conventional sol-gel method for synthesis of bioactive glass 70S30Cы

Keywords: Bioactive glass, Hydrothermal assisted sol-gel, Bioactivity, in vitro, Cell viability

Abstract

Bioactive glasses (Bioglasses) are widely synthesized by the conventional sol-gel method consisting of two main steps for sol and gel formation. However, the conversion from sol to gel requires a long time (5–7 days). In this study, the hydrothermal system was used to quickly synthesize the bioactive glass by reducing the conversion time from sol to gel. The hydrothermal assisted conventional sol-gel method was applied for synthesis of the bioactive glass 70SiO2–30CaO (mol%) (noted as 70S30C). The synthetic glass was investigated by the physical-chemical techniques. The ‘‘in vitro’’ experiments in SBF (Simulated Body Fluid) solution was also performed to evaluate the bioactivity of synthetic material. The obtained results show that the bioactive glass 70S30C was successfully elaborated by using the hydrothermal assisted conventional sol-gel
method. The consuming time was reduced compared to the conventional method. The physical-chemical characterization confirmed that the synthetic glass is amorphous material with mesoporous structure consisting of interconnected particles.
The specific surface area, pore volume and average pore diameter of synthetic glass were 142.8 m2/g, 0.52 cm3/g, and 19.1 nm, respectively. Furthermore, synthetic bioactive glass exhibited interesting bioactivity when immersed in simulated body fluid (SBF) solution for 1 days and good biocompatibility when cultured in cellular media.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Ta Anh Tuan, Faculty of Chemical Technologies, Kazan National Research Technological University, 68 ul. K. Marksa, Kazan 420015, Tatarstan, Russian Federation

PhD student, Faculty of Chemical
Technologies, Kazan National Research Technological
University, Kazan, Tatarstan, Russian Federation;
email: taanhtuan84pt@hpu2.edu.vn

Elena V. Guseva, Faculty of Chemical Technologies, Kazan National Research Technological University, 68 ul. K. Marksa, Kazan 420015, Tatarstan, Russian Federation

PhD in Chemistry, Associate
Professor, Faculty of Chemical Technologies, Kazan
National Research Technological University, Kazan,
Tatarstan, Russian Federation; email: leylaha@mail.ru

Nguyen Anh Tien, Faculty of Chemistry, Ho Chi Minh City University of Education, 280 An Dương Vương str., Ward 4, District 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

PhD in Chemistry, Associate
Professor, Chief of General and Inorganic Chemistry
Department, Ho Chi Minh City University of Education,
Vietnam; e-mail: tienna@hcmue.edu.vn

Ha Tuan Anh, Thu Dau Mot University, 6 Tran Van On str., Phu Hoa Ward, Thu Dau Mot City, Binh Duong Province 820000, Viet Nam

Thu Dau Mot University, Thu Dau
Mot City, Vietnam; e-mail: anhht@tdmu.edu.vn

Bui Xuan Vuong, Faculty of Pedagogy in Natural Sciences, Sai Gon University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Associate Professor, Faculty of
Natural Sciences, Sai Gon University, Ho Chi Minh City,
Vietnam; e-mail: bxvuong@sgu.edu.vn

Le Hong Phuc, Institute of Applied Mechanics and Informatics, 291 Dien Bien Phu str., District 03, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam

Institute of Applied Mechanics and
Informatics, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; e-mail:
lhphuc@hcmip.vast.vn

Nguyen Quan Hien, Institute of Applied Mechanics and Informatics, 291 Dien Bien Phu str., District 03, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam

Ho Chi Minh City Institute of
Physics, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology,
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; e-mail: quanhiengv@yahoo.com.vn

Bui Thi Hoa, Institute of Theoretical and Applied Research, Duy Tan University, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam; Faculty of Natural Sciences, Duy Tan University, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam

Institute of Theoretical and Applied
Research, Duy Tan University, Hanoi, Vietnam; Faculty
of Natural Sciences, Duy Tan University, Da Nang,
Vietnam; e-mail: buithihoa2@duytan.edu.vn

Nguyen Viet Long, Department of Electronics and Telecommunication, Sai Gon University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam

Department of Electronics and
Telecommunication, Sai Gon University, Ho Chi Minh
City, Vietnam; e-mail: nguyenviet_long@yahoo.com

References

Fernandez de Grado G., Keller L., Idoux-Gillet Y., Wagner Q., Musset A.-M., Benkirane-Jessel N.,Bone substitutes: a review of their characteristics, clinical use, and perspectives for large bone defects management, Journal of Tissue Engineering. 2018;9: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041731418776819

Winker T., Sass F. A., Duda G. N., Schmidt-Bleek K. A review of biomaterials in bone defect healing, remaining shortcomings and future opportunities for bone tissue engineering. Bone & Joint Research. 2018;7(3): 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.73.BJR-2017-0270.R1

Oudadesse H., Dietrich E., Bui X. V., Gal Y. L., Pellen P., Cathelineau G. Enhancement of cells proliferation and control of bioactivity of strontium doped glass. Applied Surface Science. 2011;257(20): 8587–8593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.05.022

Bui X. V., Dang T. H. Bioactive glass 58S prepared using an innovation sol-gel process. Processing and Application of Ceramics. 2019;13(1):98–103. https://doi.org/10.2298/PAC1901098B

Letaïef N., Lucas-Girot A., Oudadesse H., Meleard P., Pott T., Jelassi J., Dorbez-Sridi R. Effect of aging temperature on the structure, pore morphology and bioactivity of new sol-gel synthesized bioglass. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 2014;402(15): 194–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2014.06.005

Hench L. L., The story of bioglass. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 2006;17(11): 967–978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-0432-z

Jones J. R. Review of bioactive glass: from Hench to hybrids. Acta Biomaterialia. 2013;9(1): 4457–4486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.023

Sepulveda S., Jones J. R., Hench L. L. Characterization of melt-derived 45S5 and sol-gel-derived 58S bioactive glasses. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 2001;58(6): 734–740. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10026

Owens G. J., Singh R. K., Foroutan F., Alqaysi M., Han C. M., Mahapatra C., Kim H. W., Knowles J. C. Solgel based materials for biomedical applications. Progress in Materials Science. 2016;77: 1–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.12.001

Martínez A., Izquierdo-Barba I., Vallet-Regí M. Bioactivity of a CaO-SiO2 binary glasses system. Chemistry of Materials. 2000;12(10): 3080–3088. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm001107o

Kokubo T., Takadama H. How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity. Biomaterials. 2006;27(15): 2907–2915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017

Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. Journal of Immunological Methods. 1983;65: 55–63.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4

Tolosa L., Donato M. T., Lechón M. J. G. General cytotoxicity assessment by means of the MTT assay. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2015;1250: 333–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2074-7_26

Saravanapavan P., Hench L. L. Mesoporous calcium silicate glasses. I. Synthesis. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 2003;318(1-2): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3093(02)01864-1

Valliant E. M., Turdean-Ionescu C. A., Hanna J. V., Smith M. E., Jones J. R. Role of pH and temperature on silica network formation and calcium incorporation into sol–gel derived bioactive glasses. Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2012;22: 1613–1619. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1JM13225C

Thommes M. Physical adsorption characterization of nanoporous materials. Chemie Ingenieur Technik. 2010;82(7): 1059–1073. https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201000064

Thommes M., Kaneko K., Neimark A. V., Olivier J. P., Rodriguez-Reinoso F., Rouquerol J., Sing K. S. W. Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution. Pure and Applied Chemistry. 2015;87(9,10): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2014-1117

Zheng K., Boccaccini A. R. Sol-gel processing of bioactive glass nanoparticles: A review. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science. 2017;249: 363–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2017.03.008

Xavier K., Charlotte V., Jean-Marie N. Deeper insights into a bioactive glass nanoparticle synthesis protocol to control its morphology, dispersibility, and composition. ACS. Omega. 2019;4(3): 5768–5775. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b03598

Galarraga-Vinueza M. E., Mesquita-Guimaraes J., Magini R. S., Souza J. C. M., Fredel M. C., Boccaccini, A. R. Mesoporous bioactive glass embedding propolis and cranberry antibiofilm compounds. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2018;106(6): 1614–1625. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36352

Standard ISO 10993-5, Biological evaluation of medical devices Part 5: Test for in vitro cytotoxicity. 2009.

Published
2021-11-24
How to Cite
Tuan, T. A., Guseva, E. V., Tien, N. A., Anh, H. T., Vuong, B. X., Phuc, L. H., Hien, N. Q., Hoa, B. T., & Long, N. V. (2021). Hydrothermal assisted conventional sol-gel method for synthesis of bioactive glass 70S30Cы. Condensed Matter and Interphases, 23(4), 585-593. https://doi.org/10.17308/kcmf.2021.23/3678
Section
Original articles