Пейзажная единица художественного текста: современные подходы и перспективы исследования
Ключевые слова:
пейзажная единица, художественный текст, научные подходы, типология, концептуальная метафора
Аннотация
Статья посвящена анализу современных подходов к изучению пейзажной единицы как компонента художественного текста с целью определения ее сущности на фоне других типов дескриптивных единиц (портрета и интерьера) и степени ее изученности в лингвистике. Методом аналитического обзора исследований, объектом которых является такой дескриптивный компонент, выделяется ряд актуальных подходов к его рассмотрению (системно-структурный, типологический, функциональный, лингвокультурологический, лингвокогнитивный, лингвистика текста, теория информации), рассматриваются известные типологии пейзажной единицы, характеризуются их классификационные типы (семантический тип и его разновидности, грамматический тип и его разновидности, функциональный тип и его разновидности), утверждается, в том числе, функциональная нагруженность многочисленных выразительных средств языка в отмеченном типе дескриптивного фрагмента как для реализации авторского замысла, так и для его восприятия читателем. Делается вывод о значимости лингвокогнитивного подхода к анализу пейзажной единицы, с позиций которого предлагается рассматривать такой фрагмент как обладающий фреймовой организацией его содержания, центральным компонентом которого является концептуальная метафора.
Скачивания
Данные скачивания пока не доступны.
Литература
1. Bart R. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika. Poehtika [Selected works: Semiotics. Poetics]. Moscow: Progress, 1994. 616 p.
2. Lotman Y. M. Semiotika kultury i ponyatie teksta [Semiotics of culture and concept of text ]. In Russkaya slovesnost’: Ot teorii slovesnosti k strukture teksta. Moscow: Academia, 1997. Pр. 202–212.
3. Chernejko L. O. Grammatika semantiki [Grammar of Semantics]. In Pamyati Аnatoliya Аnatol’evicha Polikarpova. Sbornik nauch. statej. Moscow: Moscow State University, 2015. Pр. 551–556.
4. Chernejko L. O. Gipertekst kak lingvisticheskaya model’ khudozhestvennogo teksta [Hypertext as a linguistic model of artistic text]. In Struktura i semantika khudozhestvennogo teksta: Doklady VII Mezhdunarodnoj konferentsii. Moscow: 1999. Pр. 439–460.
5. Lotman Y. M. Tekst kak dinamicheskaya sistema [Text as a dynamic system]. In Struktura teksta-81: tezisy simpoziuma. Moscow: ISl RАN, 1981. Pр. 104–105.
6. Chernejko L. O. Kak rozhdaetsya smysl. Smyslovaya struktura khudozhestvennogo teksta i lingvisticheskie printsipy ee modelirovaniya: uchebnoe posobie po spetskursu dlya studentov [How a sense is born. Semantic structure of artistic text and linguistic principles of its modeling: tutorial on special course for students]. Moscow: Gnozis, 2017. 208 p.
7. Charykova O. N. Rol’ glagola v reprezentatsii individual’no-avtorskoj modeli mira v khudozhestvennom tekste. [The role of the verb in the representation of the individual model of the world in the artistic text]. PhD Dissertation Abstract. Voronezh: Voronezh State University, 2000. 23 p.
8. Mejlakh B. S. Khudozhestvennaya kartina mira kak kompleks naya problema [An artistic picture of the world as a complex problem]. In Protsess tvorchestva i khudozhestvennoe vospriyatie: Kompleksnyj podkhod: opyt, poiski, perspektivy. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1985. 318 p.
9. Khalizev V. E. Teoriya literatury [Theory of literature]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 2002. 437 p.
10. Feshhenko O. А. Kontsept DOM v khudozhestvennoj kartine mira M. I. Tsvetaevoj (na materiale prozaicheskikh proizvedenij) [Concept HOUSE in the world art painting of M. I. Tsvetayeva (on the material of prosaic works)] PhD Dissertation Abstract. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State University, 2005. 23 p.
11. Dmitrievskaya L. N. Inter’er v literature (na primere romana E. Zamyatina «My» [Interior in literature (based on E. Zamyatin’s novel “We”]: Ezhegodnyj sbornik nauchno-metodicheskih materialov. Moscow: MGOU, 2010. No. 3. P. 72–84.
12. Lushnikova G. I. Pejzazhnaya leksika sovremennogo anglijskogo yazyka v terminologii i poehzii [Landscape vocabulary of modern English in terminology and poetry]. PhD Dissertation Abstract. Kemerovo: Kemerovo State University, 1986. 16 p.
13. Voznesenskaya I. M. Leksika poehticheskikh opisanij russkoj prirody [Vocabulary of poetic descriptions of Russian nature]. PhD Dissertation Abstract. Leningrad: Leningrad State Univesity named after A. A. Zhdanov, 1984. 17 p.
14. Boldyreva S. I. Dvukhfokusnyj obraznyj kontekst v anglijskoj khudozhestvennoj proze [Two-focus figurative context in English art prose]. PhD Dissertation Abstract. Leningrad: Leningrad State University named after A. A. Zhdanov, 1989. 24 p.
15. Khudyaeva Y. Y. Razlichie v stepeni kogezii otdel’nykh ehlementov v obshhej strukture teksta [Difference in the degree of cohesion of individual elements in the overall structure of the text]. PhD Dissertation Abstract. St.Petersburg: RGPU named after А. I. Gertsen, 2001. 23 p.
16. Galanov B. E. Zhivopis’ slovom. Portret. Pejzazh. Veshh’ [Painting by a word. Portrait. Landscape. Thing.]. Moscow: Sovetskij pisatel’, 1974. 343 p.
17. Nechaeva O. А. Tipy rechi i rabota nad nimi v shkole [Speech types and working on them in school]. Krasnoyarsk: 1989. 166 p.
18. Ryabova V. N. Pejzazhnaya edinitsa teksta: semantika, grammaticheskaya forma, funktsiya (na materiale proizvedenij А. P. Chekhova) [Landscape unit of text: semantics, grammatical form, function (based on A. P. Chekhov’s works)]. PhD Dissertation Abstract. Tambov: Tambov State University, 2002. 25 p.
19. Popovskaya (Lisichenko) L.V. Lingvisticheskij analiz khudozhestvennogo teksta v vuze [Linguistic analysis of artistic text in the university]. 2nd Edition. Rostov-on-Don: Feniks, 2006. 512 p.
20. Vyrodova А. S. Lingvokul’turologicheskoe prostranstvo kolorativov v russkom poehticheskom diskurse pervoj poloviny XX veka: na materiale poehticheskikh tekstov S. А. Esenina i N. M. Rubtsova [Linguoculturological space of coloratives in the Russian poetry discourse of the first half of the 20th century: based on S. A. Esenin and N. M. Rubtsov’s poetry]. PhD Dissertation Abstract. Belgorod: Belgorod State University, 2008. 22 p.
21. Lutsenko R. S. Kontsept «pejzazh» v strukture angloyazychnogo prozaicheskogo teksta [Concept of “landscape” in the structure of English-language prosaic text]. PhD Dissertation Abstract. Saransk: Saransk State University, 2007. 23 p.
22. Vazina M. F. Priroda v proze I. А. Bunina [Nature in I. A. Bunin’s prose]. PhD Dissertation Abstract. Saint-Petersburg: Saint-Petersburg State University, 2000. 19 p.
23. Lysova O. YU. Strukturno-semanticheskaya organizatsiya opisatel’nykh fragmentov teksta [Structural and semantic organization of descriptive text fragments]. PhD Dissertation Abstract. Ufa: Samara State University, 1998. 21 p.
24. Sebina E. I. Pejzazh [Landscape]. In Vvedenieliteraturovedenie. Literaturnoe proizvedenie: Osnovnye ponyatiya i terminy. Moscow: Аkademiya, 2000. Pp. 228– 240.
25. Аsaeva M. M. Rechevye sredstva vyrazitel’nostiavtobiograficheskoj proze O. E. Mandel’shtama [Speech means of expressiveness in O. E. Mandelstam’s autobiographical prose]. PhD Dissertation Abstract. Makhachkala: Dagestan State University, 2009. 23 p.
26. Stefanishina Y. А. Stilisticheskie vyrazitel’nye sredstva v romane Dzh. Golsuorsi “Sobstvennik” i ikh perevod na russkij yazyk [Stylistic expressive means in J. Golsuorsi ‘s novel “The Owner” and their translation into Russian]. PhD Dissertation Abstract. Moscow: Moscow State Regional University, 2005. 28 p.
27. Timofeeva O. V. Metafora v khudozhestvennoj reprezentatsii mira (na materiale proizvedenij anglijskikhamerikanskikh pisatelej) [Metaphor in the artistic representation of the world (based on English and American writers’ works]. PhD Dissertation Abstract. Moscow: Moscow State Regional University, 2011. 23 p.
28. Khazagerov T. G. Ehkspressivnaya stilistika i metodika analiza khudozhestvennykh tekstov [Expressive stylistics and techniques for analyzing artistic texts]. In Problemy ehkspressivnoj stilistiki. Ed. by T. G. Khazagerov. Issue 2. Rostov-on-Don: RGU, 1992. Pp. 47–55.
2. Lotman Y. M. Semiotika kultury i ponyatie teksta [Semiotics of culture and concept of text ]. In Russkaya slovesnost’: Ot teorii slovesnosti k strukture teksta. Moscow: Academia, 1997. Pр. 202–212.
3. Chernejko L. O. Grammatika semantiki [Grammar of Semantics]. In Pamyati Аnatoliya Аnatol’evicha Polikarpova. Sbornik nauch. statej. Moscow: Moscow State University, 2015. Pр. 551–556.
4. Chernejko L. O. Gipertekst kak lingvisticheskaya model’ khudozhestvennogo teksta [Hypertext as a linguistic model of artistic text]. In Struktura i semantika khudozhestvennogo teksta: Doklady VII Mezhdunarodnoj konferentsii. Moscow: 1999. Pр. 439–460.
5. Lotman Y. M. Tekst kak dinamicheskaya sistema [Text as a dynamic system]. In Struktura teksta-81: tezisy simpoziuma. Moscow: ISl RАN, 1981. Pр. 104–105.
6. Chernejko L. O. Kak rozhdaetsya smysl. Smyslovaya struktura khudozhestvennogo teksta i lingvisticheskie printsipy ee modelirovaniya: uchebnoe posobie po spetskursu dlya studentov [How a sense is born. Semantic structure of artistic text and linguistic principles of its modeling: tutorial on special course for students]. Moscow: Gnozis, 2017. 208 p.
7. Charykova O. N. Rol’ glagola v reprezentatsii individual’no-avtorskoj modeli mira v khudozhestvennom tekste. [The role of the verb in the representation of the individual model of the world in the artistic text]. PhD Dissertation Abstract. Voronezh: Voronezh State University, 2000. 23 p.
8. Mejlakh B. S. Khudozhestvennaya kartina mira kak kompleks naya problema [An artistic picture of the world as a complex problem]. In Protsess tvorchestva i khudozhestvennoe vospriyatie: Kompleksnyj podkhod: opyt, poiski, perspektivy. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1985. 318 p.
9. Khalizev V. E. Teoriya literatury [Theory of literature]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 2002. 437 p.
10. Feshhenko O. А. Kontsept DOM v khudozhestvennoj kartine mira M. I. Tsvetaevoj (na materiale prozaicheskikh proizvedenij) [Concept HOUSE in the world art painting of M. I. Tsvetayeva (on the material of prosaic works)] PhD Dissertation Abstract. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State University, 2005. 23 p.
11. Dmitrievskaya L. N. Inter’er v literature (na primere romana E. Zamyatina «My» [Interior in literature (based on E. Zamyatin’s novel “We”]: Ezhegodnyj sbornik nauchno-metodicheskih materialov. Moscow: MGOU, 2010. No. 3. P. 72–84.
12. Lushnikova G. I. Pejzazhnaya leksika sovremennogo anglijskogo yazyka v terminologii i poehzii [Landscape vocabulary of modern English in terminology and poetry]. PhD Dissertation Abstract. Kemerovo: Kemerovo State University, 1986. 16 p.
13. Voznesenskaya I. M. Leksika poehticheskikh opisanij russkoj prirody [Vocabulary of poetic descriptions of Russian nature]. PhD Dissertation Abstract. Leningrad: Leningrad State Univesity named after A. A. Zhdanov, 1984. 17 p.
14. Boldyreva S. I. Dvukhfokusnyj obraznyj kontekst v anglijskoj khudozhestvennoj proze [Two-focus figurative context in English art prose]. PhD Dissertation Abstract. Leningrad: Leningrad State University named after A. A. Zhdanov, 1989. 24 p.
15. Khudyaeva Y. Y. Razlichie v stepeni kogezii otdel’nykh ehlementov v obshhej strukture teksta [Difference in the degree of cohesion of individual elements in the overall structure of the text]. PhD Dissertation Abstract. St.Petersburg: RGPU named after А. I. Gertsen, 2001. 23 p.
16. Galanov B. E. Zhivopis’ slovom. Portret. Pejzazh. Veshh’ [Painting by a word. Portrait. Landscape. Thing.]. Moscow: Sovetskij pisatel’, 1974. 343 p.
17. Nechaeva O. А. Tipy rechi i rabota nad nimi v shkole [Speech types and working on them in school]. Krasnoyarsk: 1989. 166 p.
18. Ryabova V. N. Pejzazhnaya edinitsa teksta: semantika, grammaticheskaya forma, funktsiya (na materiale proizvedenij А. P. Chekhova) [Landscape unit of text: semantics, grammatical form, function (based on A. P. Chekhov’s works)]. PhD Dissertation Abstract. Tambov: Tambov State University, 2002. 25 p.
19. Popovskaya (Lisichenko) L.V. Lingvisticheskij analiz khudozhestvennogo teksta v vuze [Linguistic analysis of artistic text in the university]. 2nd Edition. Rostov-on-Don: Feniks, 2006. 512 p.
20. Vyrodova А. S. Lingvokul’turologicheskoe prostranstvo kolorativov v russkom poehticheskom diskurse pervoj poloviny XX veka: na materiale poehticheskikh tekstov S. А. Esenina i N. M. Rubtsova [Linguoculturological space of coloratives in the Russian poetry discourse of the first half of the 20th century: based on S. A. Esenin and N. M. Rubtsov’s poetry]. PhD Dissertation Abstract. Belgorod: Belgorod State University, 2008. 22 p.
21. Lutsenko R. S. Kontsept «pejzazh» v strukture angloyazychnogo prozaicheskogo teksta [Concept of “landscape” in the structure of English-language prosaic text]. PhD Dissertation Abstract. Saransk: Saransk State University, 2007. 23 p.
22. Vazina M. F. Priroda v proze I. А. Bunina [Nature in I. A. Bunin’s prose]. PhD Dissertation Abstract. Saint-Petersburg: Saint-Petersburg State University, 2000. 19 p.
23. Lysova O. YU. Strukturno-semanticheskaya organizatsiya opisatel’nykh fragmentov teksta [Structural and semantic organization of descriptive text fragments]. PhD Dissertation Abstract. Ufa: Samara State University, 1998. 21 p.
24. Sebina E. I. Pejzazh [Landscape]. In Vvedenieliteraturovedenie. Literaturnoe proizvedenie: Osnovnye ponyatiya i terminy. Moscow: Аkademiya, 2000. Pp. 228– 240.
25. Аsaeva M. M. Rechevye sredstva vyrazitel’nostiavtobiograficheskoj proze O. E. Mandel’shtama [Speech means of expressiveness in O. E. Mandelstam’s autobiographical prose]. PhD Dissertation Abstract. Makhachkala: Dagestan State University, 2009. 23 p.
26. Stefanishina Y. А. Stilisticheskie vyrazitel’nye sredstva v romane Dzh. Golsuorsi “Sobstvennik” i ikh perevod na russkij yazyk [Stylistic expressive means in J. Golsuorsi ‘s novel “The Owner” and their translation into Russian]. PhD Dissertation Abstract. Moscow: Moscow State Regional University, 2005. 28 p.
27. Timofeeva O. V. Metafora v khudozhestvennoj reprezentatsii mira (na materiale proizvedenij anglijskikhamerikanskikh pisatelej) [Metaphor in the artistic representation of the world (based on English and American writers’ works]. PhD Dissertation Abstract. Moscow: Moscow State Regional University, 2011. 23 p.
28. Khazagerov T. G. Ehkspressivnaya stilistika i metodika analiza khudozhestvennykh tekstov [Expressive stylistics and techniques for analyzing artistic texts]. In Problemy ehkspressivnoj stilistiki. Ed. by T. G. Khazagerov. Issue 2. Rostov-on-Don: RGU, 1992. Pp. 47–55.
Опубликован
2020-06-15
Как цитировать
Лаенко, Л. В., & Душкова, А. М. (2020). Пейзажная единица художественного текста: современные подходы и перспективы исследования. Вестник ВГУ. Серия: Лингвистика и межкультурная коммуникация, (3), 34-41. https://doi.org/10.17308/lic.2020.3/2929
Выпуск
Раздел
Теория языка
