Manipulative strategies on english-language media scene

  • A. B. Nedzelskaya Voronezh State University
  • O. O. Boriskina Voronezh State University
Keywords: media, manipulation, macrostrategy of discredit, tactic, legitimation, proximisation

Abstract

The article considers manipulative persuasion as the main discursive social practice consisting of strategies and tactics aimed to shape public opinion on the media scene. The research information base is English-language articles in eresources of British and American media and posts in social networks. The mechanisms of linguistic manipulation are considered from the perspective of the tactics and strategic approach. The basic features of manipulation are distinguished and described. The manipulative strategies are conveniently classified into strategies of factual manipulation and strategies of ideological polarization according to the degree of misrepresentation of information. In both cases the effect is achieved by implementation of macrostrategies of discredit and legitimation. The specifi c focus is made on the most frequent tactics of discrediting strategies while macrostrategy of legitimation is considered from the perspective of proximisation theory. Proximisation is a manipulative strategy of addressing events distant from the present moment in space, time and moral plan but able to symbolically shift to the foreground (by an actor’s efforts) closer to the information centre where a manipulator and a recipient are. Proximisation on all levels allows to achieve manipulative effect, namely belief in the need for immediate measures to prevent risks, which facilitates legitimating action planned by a manipulator.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

A. B. Nedzelskaya, Voronezh State University

Post-graduate Student Theoretical and Applied Linguistics Department

O. O. Boriskina, Voronezh State University

Doctor of Philology, Professor of the Theoretical and Applied Linguistics Department

References

1. Аgapova S. G., Аgapova E. А., Gushhina L. V. Manipulyativnye strategii i taktiki v politicheskom diskurse angloyazychnykh SMI: monografi ya [Manipulative strategies and tacktics in political discourse of English-speaking mass media: monography]. Rostov-upon-Don, 2015. 93 p.
2. Danilova А. А. Manipulirovanie slovom v sredstvakh massovoj informatsii [Manipulation with a word in the mass media]. Moscow: «KDU», 2009. 234 p.
3. Аntonova А. V. Sistema sredstv rechevoj manipulyatsii v britanskom politicheskom diskurse: retsipientotsen-tricheskij podkhod [The system of means of speech manipulation in the British political discourse: recipient-centred approach]. Sc.D Dissertation Abstract. Povolzh'e State Socio-humanitarian Academy: Samara, 2011. 45 p.
4. Dotsenko E. L. Psikhologiya manipulyatsii: fenomeny, mekhanizmy i zashhita [Psychology of manipulation: phenomena, mechanisms and protection]. Moscow: MGU, 1997. 344 p.
5. Dijk van, T. A. Discourse and manipulation // Discourse and Society. 2006. Vol. 17 (3). P. 359–383.
6. Kopnina G. А. Rechevoe manipulirovanie: ucheb. posobie [Speech manipulation: textbook]. 4 izd. ispr. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka, 2012. 170 p.
7. Grishaeva L. I. Sredstva i sposoby sozdaniya aksio-logicheskogo konteksta v mediatekste. In: Mediatekst: strategii funktsii stil': kollektivnaya monografi ya [Means and methods of creating axiological context in a media text. In: Media text: strategies, functions, style: collective monograpthy]. L. I. Grishaeva, A. G. Pastukhov, T. V. Chernysheva (otv. red.). Oryol: Oryol State Institute of Arts and Culture, 2010. P. 80–100.
8. Funktsional'nyj potentsial imeni sobstvennogo v mediaprostranstve, ili «korolevstvo krivykh zerkal». In: Imya sobstvennoe v mediaprostranstve: monografi ya. [Functional capacity of proper names or “Kingdom of crooked mirrors”. In: Proper names on the media scene. L. I. Grishaeva, O. O. Boriskina, N. А. Fenenko, V. N. Аbabij, V. G. Shimko ; Voronezh State University. Voronezh: VGU, 2019. Pp. 107–182.
9. Oziumenko V. I. Medijnyj diskurs v situatsii informatsionnoj vojny: ot manipulyatsii – k agressii [Media discourse in a situation of information war: from manipulation to aggression]. In: Vestnik RUDN. Series: Linguistics. 2017. Issue 1. Pp. 203–220.
10. Sternin I. А., Shesternina А. M. Markery fejka v mediatekstakh. Rabochie materialy [Markers of a fake in media texts: Working materials]. Voronezh: OOO «RITM», 2020. 34 p.
11. Mikhal'skaya А. K. Vojna slov: ritorika i poehtika propagandy. In: Lingvistika informatsionno-psikhologicheskoj vojny: monografi ya [War of words: rhetoric and poetics of propaganda. In: Linguistics of information and psychological war]. B. II / А. А. Bernatskaya, L. А. Gavrilov, V . А. ZHilina. Krasnoyarsk: Siberian Federal University, 2019. Pp. 56–79.
12. Ershov Yu. M.. Fenomen fejka v kontekste kommunikatsionnykh praktik [Phenomenon of fake in the context of communication practices]. In: Vestnik TGU. Filologiya. 2018. Issue 52. Pp. 245–256.
13. Mikhalyova O. L. Politicheskij diskurs: Spetsifi ka manipulyativnogo vozdejstviya [Political discourse: Spec-ifi city of manipulative persuasion]. Moscow: LIBROKOM, 2009. 256 p.
14. Tagil'tseva Yu. R. Strategii i taktiki informatsion-no-psikhologicheskoj vojny v kontekste rossijsko-britanskikh otnoshenij. In: Lingvistika informatsionno-psikhologicheskoj vojny: monografi ya [ Strategies and tactics of information and psychological war in the context of Russia – UK relations. In: Linguistics of information and psychological war]. B. II / А. А. Bernatskaya, L. А. Gavrilov, V. А. ZHilina. Krasnoyarsk: Siberian Federal University, 2019. Pp. 308–331.
15. Ryadovaya N. S. Sopostavitel'nyj analiz argumen-tativnykh strategij politicheskogo diskursa v krizisnoj situatsii (na materiale rechej prezidentov SShА i Rossii) [Comparative analysis of argumentative strategies of political discourse in crisis situation (on the material of speeches by the USA and Russia’s Presidents]. PhD Dissertation Ab¬stract. Omsk State Pedagogical University: Moscow, 2013. 28 p.
16. Cap P. Applying cognitive pragmatics to Critical Discourse Studies: A proximization analysis of three public space discourses. In: Journal of Pragmatics. 2014. Issue 70 (24). Pp. 16–30.
17. Cap P. The Language of Fear. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.
SOURCES
1. Sturgeon : SNP will hold Scottish independence vote if it wins in May // The Guardian. 2021. 24 Jan. URL
2. ‘He panicked’: Biden blames Trump for 200,000 US coronavirus deaths in explosive presidential debate // The Independent. 2020. 30 Sept. URL
3. Transcript for the fi rst debate // The New York Times. 2016. 28 Sept. URL
4. Boris Johnson compares Russian World Cup to Hitler's 1936 Olympics // The Guardian. 2018. 21 March. URL
5. Trump’s Tweeter. 2020. 12 Dec. URL
6. Russia Erupts in Fury Over Biden’s Calling Putin a Killer // The New York Times. 2021. 18 March. URL
7. ‘Stunning in ugliness & tone’: Trump denounced for attacking Somali refugees in Minnesota // The Washington Post. 2019. 11 Oct. URL
8. U.S. Maritime Strategy : Advantage at Sea // U.S. Naval Institute News. 2020. 17 December. URL
Published
2021-06-01
How to Cite
Nedzelskaya, A. B., & Boriskina, O. O. (2021). Manipulative strategies on english-language media scene. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, (2). https://doi.org/10.17308/lic.2021.2/3417
Section
Germanic Philology