Sentences expressing situations of touch in russian semantic-functional syntax
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17308/lic.2020.1/2740Keywords:
semantic-functional syntax, aspect-by-aspect analysis techniques, the nominative aspect, semanticfunctional field of touch, obligatory and optional actantsAbstract
One of the main problems of functional linguistics is the scientific study of human perception of the outer world, including tactile (haptic) perception. On the syntactic level of language, it is implemented as a kind of subject-object relations expressed by simple sentences. In our studies we describe semantics and structure of sentences using the aspect-by-aspect techniques. The main aspect is nominative, which in its turn is divided into situational-and-structural and relative-structural. The sentences of touch form a semantic-functional field that has a core and periphery in its structure. The basis of the organization of sentences of this semantic-structural type is a verb, therefore, the variants of the semantic structure are determined by a certain lexical and grammatical category (LGC) of the verb. The verb to touch plays the role of the basic identifier of constructions constituting the studied semantic-functional field, since any touch begins with a physical or mental touch on the subject. To the core of the field belong the sentences with verbs of contact-directed action (to touch). The field periphery is represented by sentences with verbs of five other LGC: touch of the object without moving it; touch of the object with moving it; subject movement with the seme of touching the object; sound with the seme of touching the object; localization with the seme of touching the object. In the invariant semantic structure of sentences expressing touch situations there are obligatory (subject and object) and optional (instrument, localizer) nominal actants. As an optional actant most often acts an instrument, which is understood as an object involved in the action and contributing to its implementation. The instrument is further subcategorized into an inalienable and an alienable one.
References
Koprov V. Y. Nominativny`j aspekt strukturno-semanticheskogo ustrojstva prostogo predlozheniya (na material russkogo, anglijskogo i vengerskogo yazy`kov) [Nominative aspect of structural-semantic organization of simple sentence (on material of Russian, English and Hungarian languages)]: dis. ... dok. fi lol. nauk: 10.02.19. Voronezh, 1999. 284 p.
Uryson E. V. Yazy`kovaya kartina mira VS obixodny` e predstavleniya (model` vospriyatiya v russkom yazy`ke) [The language worldview VS. everyday representations (perception model in Russian)] // Voprosy` yazy` koznaniya. 1998. № 2. Pр. 3–21.
Anan’ev B. G., Vekker L. M., Lomov B. F. Osyazanie v processax poznaniya i truda [Touch in the processes of cognition and labor]. Moscow: Izd-vo akad. ped. nauk, 1959. 263 p.
Krejdlin G. E. Neverbal`naya semiotika: Yazyk tela i estestvennyj yazyk [Nonverbal Semiotics: Body Language and Natural Language]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2004. 581 p.
Rubinshtejn S. L. Osnovy obshhej psikhologii [Fundamentals of General Psychology]. Saint-Petersburg: Izdatel` stvo «Piter», 2000. 685 p.
Apresyan Y. D. Izbranny`e trudy`: T. II. Integral`noe opisanie yazy`ka i sistemnaya leksikografi ya [Selected Works: T. II. Integral language description and systemic lexicography]. Moscow: Shkola «Yazyki russkoj kul’tury». 1995. 767 p.
Slovar` russkogo yazy`ka: V 4 t. / AN SSSR, In-t rus. yaz.; рod red. A. P. Evgen’evoj [Dictionary of the Russian language]. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. Moscow: Russkij yazyk, 1981–1984. Т. II. 736 p. ; Т. IV. 791 p.
Bol`shoj tolkovyj slovar` russkix glagolov. Ideografi cheskoe opisanie. Sinonimy. Antonimy. Anglijskie ekvivalenty [Large explanatory dictionary of Russian verbs. Ideographic description. Synonyms Antonyms. English equivalents] / pod redakciej prof. L. G. Babenko. – Moscow: AST-PRESS KNIGA. 576 p.
Avdevnina O. Yu. Kategoriya vospriyatiya i sredstva ee vy`razheniya v sovremennom russkom yazy`ke: dis. ... d-ra fi lol. nauk: 10.02.01 Category of perception and means of expression in modern Russian: dis. ... dok. fi lol. nauk: 10.02.01. Moscow , 2014. 384 p.











