Microstructural and hydrophilic properties of acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene copolymer ABS samples with different 3D-printed patterns

Authors

  • Aleksandr S. Lenshin Voronezh State University, 1, Universitetskaya pl., Voronezh 394018, Russian Federation
  • Vera E. Frolova Voronezh State University, 1, Universitetskaya pl., Voronezh 394018, Russian Federation
  • Vladimir A. Makagonov Voronezh State Technical University, 14, Moskovsky pr., Voronezh 94026, Russian Federation
  • Alexandra K. Pelagina Voronezh State University, 1, Universitetskaya pl., Voronezh 394018, Russian Federation
  • Evelina P. Domashevskaya Voronezh State University, 1, Universitetskaya pl., Voronezh 394018, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17308/kcmf.2026.28/13588

Keywords:

Acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene copolymer ABS, Various 3D-printed patterns, Printed samples, Surface morphology, Amorphous state, IR spectra, Contact angles, Hydrophilic surface

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to investigate the influence of different 3D printing patterns, under identical thermal and mechanical parameters of the 3D printing process itself, on the microstructural and hydrophilic properties of amorphous ABS copolymer samples printed with five different 3D printing patterns by sequentially depositing layers using FDM (Fused Deposition Modeling).

Conclusions: The results of studying the printed samples using SEM, X-ray diffraction, IR spectroscopy, and contact angle measurements showed that the combination of thermal and mechanical effects during 3D printing in the studied extrusion mode does not cause noticeable orientation of the polymer chains of the original amorphous ABS copolymer, does not disrupt its intrastructural chemical bonds, and the surface of all printed samples with five different patterns is hydrophilic. Moreover, the printed sample with the most complex geometry is the 1_Hilbert pattern, which has the most distorted morphology and surface defects and exhibits the highest contact angle (j = 67o), exceeding the corresponding values in samples with other patterns (j ≈ 60o) by ~10 %, and has a hydrophilic surface

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Aleksandr S. Lenshin, Voronezh State University, 1, Universitetskaya pl., Voronezh 394018, Russian Federation

    Dr. Sci. (Phys.–Math.), Leading Researcher, Department of Solid State Physics and Nanostructures, Voronezh State University (Voronezh, Russian Federation)

  • Vera E. Frolova, Voronezh State University, 1, Universitetskaya pl., Voronezh 394018, Russian Federation

    Cand. Sci. (Phys.–Math.), Associate Professor, Department of Solid State Physics and Nanostructures, Voronezh State University (Voronezh, Russian Federation)

  • Vladimir A. Makagonov, Voronezh State Technical University, 14, Moskovsky pr., Voronezh 94026, Russian Federation

    Cand. Sci. (Phys.–Math.), Associate Professor, Department of Physics, Voronezh State Technical University (Voronezh, Russian Federation)

  • Alexandra K. Pelagina, Voronezh State University, 1, Universitetskaya pl., Voronezh 394018, Russian Federation

    postgraduate student, Department of General Physics, Voronezh State University (Voronezh, Russian Federation)

  • Evelina P. Domashevskaya, Voronezh State University, 1, Universitetskaya pl., Voronezh 394018, Russian Federation

    Dr. Sci. (Phys.–Math.), Professor, Consulting Professor, Department of Solid State Physics and Nanostructures, Voronezh State University (Voronezh, Russian Federation)

References

1. Kumar R. M., Rajini N. T., Kumar S. M., Mayandi K., Siengchin S., Ismail S. O. Thermal and structural characterization of acrylonitrile butadiene sstyrene (ABS) copolymer blended with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) particulate composite. Materials Research Express.2019;6(8): 085330. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab250f

2. Peters E. N. Plastics: thermoplastics, thermosets, and elastomers. Handbook of Materials Selection. Kutz M. (ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2002. p. 363–365. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470172551.ch11

3. Kutnjak-Mravlincic S., Sutlovic A., Glogar M. I., Ercegovic Ražic S., Godec D. Innovative development of batch dyed 3D printed acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene objects. Molecules. 2021;26: 6637. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26216637

4. Kulich D. M., Gaggar S. K., Lowry V., Stepien R. Acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene polymers. In: Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Technology. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley&Sons; 2001. p.174–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471440264.pst011

5. Mukhamedyanov E. R., Orlova N. Yu. Toxicity of nonengineering plastics during extrusion*. Collection of scientific papers of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference. December 22–23, 2020. Moscow: NRNU MEPhI; Snezhinsk: SFTI NRNU MEPhI; 2020: 56-59.

6. Harper C. A. Handbook of plastic and elastomers. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1997. p. 1–62. ISBN 0070266816

7. Rutkowski J. V., Levin B. C. Acrylonitrile-butadienestyrene copolymers (ABS): pyrolysis and combustion products and their toxicity- a review of the literature. Fire and Materials. 1986;10(3-4): 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/fam.810100303

8. Steeman P. A., Meier R. J. The structure of styreneacrylonitrile/bytadiene polymer studied by 2D-i.r. spectroscopy. Polymers, 1997;38(21): 5435–5462. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0032-3861(97)00074-8

9. Bandeira L. C., Campos B. M., Ciuffi K. J., … Maia I. A. Calcium phosphate coatings by sol-gel on acrylonitrilebutadiene-styrene substrate. Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society. 2017;28(6): 943–949. https://doi.org/10.21577/0103-5053.20160244

10. Boricha A. G., Murthy Z. V. P. Acrlonitrile-butadienestyrene/chitosan blend membranes: preparation, characterization and performance for the separation of heavy metals. Journal of Membrane Science. 2009;339(1): 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.04.057

11. Desrousseaux C., Cueff1 R., Aumeran C., … Sautou V. Fabrication of acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene nanostructures with anodic alumina oxide templates, characterization and biofilm development test for staphylococcus epidermidis. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(8): e0135632. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135632

12. Neher B., Gafur Md. A., Al-Mansur M. A., Bhuiyan Md. M. R., Qadir Md. R., Ahmed F. Investigation of the surface morphology and structural characterization of palm fiber reinforced acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (PF-ABS) composites. Materials Sciences and Applications, 2014;5: 378–386. https://doi.org/10.4236/msa.2014.56043

13. Lenshin A. S., Frolova V. E., Ivkov S. S., DomashevskayaE. P. Microstructural and hydrophilic properties of polyethylene terephthalate glycol polymer samples with different 3D printing patterns. Condensed Matter and Interphases. 2024;26(1): 78–87. https://doi.org/10.17308/kcmf.2024.26/11810

14. Lenshin A. S., FrolovaV. E., Kannykin S. V., Domashevskaya E. P. Microstructural and hydrophilic properties of polylactide polymer samples with various 3D printing patterns. Polymers. 2024;16: 1281. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16091281

15. Oshmyan V. G., Timan S. A., Shamaev M. Yu. Modeling of ductile failure of polymer blends and composites with account of interface formation. Polymer Science, Series A. 2003;45(10): 1011–1018. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=13425982]

16. Gremlikh G. U. The language of spectra. Introduction to the interpretation of spectra of organic compounds*. Brooker. Opt.; 2002. 94 p. (in Russ.)

17. Hollas J. M. Modern Spectroscopy. Fourth Edition. The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 2004. 452 р.

18. Тolstoy V. P., Chernyshova I. V., Skryshevsky V. A. Handbook of infrared spectroscopy of ultrathin films. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2003. 739 p. https://doi.org/10.1002/047123432x

19. Kiselev M. G., Savich V. V., Pavich T. P. Determination of the contact wetting angle on flat surfaces. Bulletin of BNTU. 2006;1: 38–41. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21398120

20. Elesina V. V. Wetting angle. Methodical recommendations*. Altai State Technical University named after I. I. Polzunov Publ.; 2019. 22 c. (in Russ.)

21. Pavlov I. N., Rinkevichyus B. S., Tolkachev A. V. A setup for visualizing the evaporation of a liquid drop using the method of frustrated total internal reflection of a laser beam. Instruments and Experimental Techniques. 2013;56(2): 242–246. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0020441213020103

Published

2026-04-01

Issue

Section

Original articles

How to Cite

Microstructural and hydrophilic properties of acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene copolymer ABS samples with different 3D-printed patterns. (2026). Kondensirovannye Sredy I Mezhfaznye Granitsy = Condensed Matter and Interphases, 28(1), 69-80. https://doi.org/10.17308/kcmf.2026.28/13588

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>